User talk:BlatherAndBlatherscite

Regarding your edit here. There are far more editors opposing your version. You might want to discuss the differences in the talk page. We have no clue what you're thinking. Aucaman^Talk 23:46, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Also be careful not to violate WP:3RR. Aucaman^Talk 23:47, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What you're saying might be true, but you need to provide sources first (see WP:NOR). Also use the talk page to substantiate your claims. Otherwise people would think you have bad intentions in mind. Aucaman^Talk 00:21, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your note regarding "stalking"[edit]

Hi, BlatherAndBlatherscite. I saw your notice at the admin's noticeboard, and I can say that Palmiro's comment here is accurate. According to our policy at Wikipedia:Verifiability, any unsourced edit may be removed by any editor. If you make an edit to an article, and it gets reverted, the appropriate action is not to revert back, but to take the issue to the article talk page and deal with whatever issues exist.

Welcome to Wikipedia, and happy editing. (Boilerplate welcome message to follow) -GTBacchus^(talk) 00:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't know anything about Islam or its history, but I know that, at Wikipedia, verifiability is mandatory. If you cite a reliable source verifying that your addition to the article is true, and it still gets removed, just let me know. Until you do the required background work though, don't blame anyone but yourself when you get reverted. -GTBacchus^(talk) 01:07, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, BlatherAndBlatherscite, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -GTBacchus^(talk) 00:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you for 24 hours for violating 3RR on Muhammad--Shanel 01:50, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}} The 3RR states that reverting vandals does not count. BlatherAndBlatherscite 03:27, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just because you say it's vandalism doesn't make it so. You were clearly POV pushing. --Rory096 03:28, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, they were vandalizing by pushing a factually incorrect version. BlatherAndBlatherscite 03:29, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request denied - clear violation of the 3RR. Check out our policy on vandalism to learn more about what "simple vandalism" really entails - these are the only circumstances in which the 3RR doesn't apply. (ESkog)^(Talk) 22:56, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would kindly suggest that you take it slowly, learn the ropes and become a useful contributor. Start here: Wikipedia:Five Pillars. Take some time, read through the links on that page. Otherwise, you will get frustrated, you will frustrate others and your experience of Wikipedia will be a bad one. Take it easy, you will not regret it. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 04:07, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Five Pillars[edit]

They suggested you look at Wikipedia:Five pillars.

If this does not help try this: [1]

can you e-mail me ? Zeq 08:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request unblock[edit]

I request unblock as Zero000 and his fellow islamic apologists have taken this time to slander me, calling me a troll. BlatherAndBlatherscite 03:35, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Denied as per 5 hours ago. (ESkog)^(Talk) 03:36, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I give no credence to their friends doing these sorts of things. BlatherAndBlatherscite 04:26, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back[edit]

Welcome back. You might want to check WP:V and WP:NOR before making controversial edits. Also learn to use the talk pages and find and cite sources for your claims. Aucaman^Talk 06:53, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Who the fuck is slimvirgin and what right does she have to do this?[edit]

There is no reason for someone to do this, much less put an insulting message on my user page. BlatherAndBlatherscite 06:44, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a Checkuser done on you and you've been determined to be a sockpuppet of User:Enviroknot. User:Enviroknot is currently banned from Wikipedia. --Rory096 06:48, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been denied, since you are the sock of a banned user, and are trolling.--Shanel 06:57, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]