User talk:Blipadouzi

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Blipadouzi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Colin°^Talk 11:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Everett Kaser Software[edit]

A tag has been placed on Everett Kaser Software, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 23:55, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the only major issues with it were that the content did not contain a neutral point of view and was written in a promotional tone. Refer to the other article that was linked to in the reference you provided on Talk: 3D Realms, it shows a good example of how to shape the article. If you have any other questions feel free to ask.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 01:09, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a bundle...I will see what I can do yto improve on it before reposting it.Blipadouzi 12:19, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your VandalProof Application[edit]

Dear Blipadouzi,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that you only have 86 mainspace edits. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 19:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Betacommand...after I had initially applied, I went and looked at my contribution statistics and realised I did meet the necessary quota...but I figured there was no harm in trying. Seeing as my application was already there, I left it. However, this being said, do expect to see my name again once I hit 250. Thanks againBlipadouzi 19:59, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:HOLICTEST[edit]

Hi Blipadouzi! I noticed you removed the Willie on Wheels and Communism Vandal questions from the Wikipediholic test as vandalism. We appreciate your doing so, but I have added it back, since it isn't vandalism (this is the kind of question that should be removed, but isn't because of humor). Obviously, those vandals wouldn't be taking the test, but the questions are still there. It might, however, be necessary to remove that kind of question to shorten the test, but that would have to be discussed. Thanks for trying to help! | AndonicO ^{Talk · Sign Here} 01:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The only reason I removed them was because one quetion (Willie on Wheels) was marked for like (-100000000000) points or something silly like that...and the reason I marked them as vandalism was because of what is written when you click on the Communism link...It was only after I had removed them that I did want to mark them as vandalism...but as you know, we can't change our comments on our edits. Anyway, thanksBlipadouzi 09:31, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A little cleanup[edit]

Would you mind cleaning the warnings off my talk page? this is a shared IP at a cybercafe and would like to avoid any further confrontations with other wikipedians. thanks for you help it would look bad if i removed them myself. 66.93.251.114 02:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What I would recommend that you do then is to create yourself a Wiki ID...I have placed a tag on your talk page that will help you in this matter.Blipadouzi 02:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adventures in Odyssey[edit]

I think this is how to message you I'm not really sure anyway I was wondering where you got the information that adventures in Odyssey volume 48 is called the Moment of Truth? I looked on the whitsend.org site and on the volume 47 page it said that the album contains a preview of volume 48 - the top floor. This is where I got my information from. Redekopmark

I got my information on Album 48 from http://www.aiosoda.com/ As for whitsend.org, they may be refering to "The Top Floor" as the album title...or they may be refering to that particular episode being previewed in Album 47.Blipadouzi 02:45, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status[edit]

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 16:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]