User talk:BlockyMan1
Terrence Miles[edit]
Hello, just wanted to let you know that you placed a {{stub}} tag on a page that already had one on it which isn't necessary. It's always nice to see new editors try out page patrolling as that's how I got started on wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask! Winner 42 Talk to me! 23:46, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Questions regarding recent behaviour[edit]
Have you considered that we have enough to do without chasing down and correcting vandalisms introduced directly by you to see how good we are? And why do you feel that you have any right at all to test editors who have been here vastly longer than you have? Before you request unblock here, if you do, you will need to have very good answers to these questions. A simple apology will not be adequate. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:04, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
My "abusing multiple accounts"[edit]
BlockyMan1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was not abusing multiple accounts. I just wanted to run a test. I heard about a guy who did it and did not get in trouble so I wanted to try it for myself. I did not mean any harm. Anyway, this is my helping account, my main account. I made that account just for a test. I dont care about that account, I just want this one. I love helping Wikipedia, its my passion. I like doing it. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE reinstate me. I love Wikipedia, and I love helping it. I HATE vandalism. Also, I only made 5 edits. One person did 3, one did two, so its not like I vandalized half of Wikipedia. ANTHONY PLEASE READ THESE ARE YOUR QUESTION ANSWERS. 1. No I did not consider that, again as I said earlier I heard about a guy who did a test, and did not get in trouble. He made about 30-40 incorrect edits, so I did not think I would get in trouble if I made 5. 2. I saw the article online about the guy who did that test and I thought "Hey, that would be cool to try." I dont know why I did, but I did. I didnt mean for things to get to this point, especially when that other guy did not get in trouble. I guess I just never thought of it that way. Also, my test was not about the editors, it was about how fast people would realize a mistake. I promise I will never do this again. If I do you can ban me for life, I wont appeal. Please reconsider. BlockyMan (talk) 13:12, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
These are not good answers. You were abusing multiple accounts. You were using the other accounts to waste the time of volunteers who are actual contributors. If you thought any of that was "cool", then I'm afraid this is not for you. Kuru (talk) 14:37, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Block[edit]
BlockyMan1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Ok, I have learned my lesson. Can I get unblocked, or at the least, a timetable?BlockyMan (talk) 12:29, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No. Even the "helpful" account's edits far too often were anything but. I see no indication that unblocking you would be beneficial to the project. Huon (talk) 14:20, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.