User talk:Blog Mav Rick

Talk to me...[edit]

But, before you do, please check this out:

Dallas Mavericks official website

I'd be happy to talk to you ...[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

I couldn't help but notice that your very first contributions were about Texas. You might think about checking out the user group WikiProject Texas. You might find some like-minded Wikipedians there.

But don't stop there! We're all happy to have you. So enjoy yourself.

Good luck! - Che Nuevara: ^{Join the Revolution} 00:43, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

China as a superpower.[edit]

Hi Blog Mav Rick. I saw your unilateral declaration of China as a superpower. Please have patience, China will soon be a superpower. In the mean time, let's follow what is universally accepted, and what most notable sources say. deeptrivia (talk) 17:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Currently, based on the criteria set forth to define superpower, China qualifies. Any contention could be explained, but there has been no contention as to why it currently is not a superpower.--Blog Mav Rick 17:22, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

India and the UK match those criteria to a certain extent as well. But nowhere near enough to the US to be called a superpower. The term superpower can be considered a relative thing, the strongest and any nation that can rival it (ie. the US and Soviet Union) can be considered a superpower. Nobleeagle (Talk) 22:43, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

China as superpower[edit]

Please do not create content forks. You are duplicating part of People's Republic of China as an emerging superpower. If the article title is wrong, it should be moved there. Thanks. --cesarb 17:56, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing text without explanation[edit]

Deleting large chunks of text without explanation is considered vandalism. Please explain your edits or risk being blocked. Consider this a warning.--Jiang 03:13, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What large chucks of text are you referring to? You can't just accuse me of something w/o backing up your claims...--Blog Mav Rick 03:16, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The deletions at American-born Chinese and Chinese American.--Jiang 03:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing 2 sentences does not qualify as large chunks of text. In the normal course of editing articles, sentences are added and subtracted.--Blog Mav Rick 03:33, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

America and United States[edit]

I removed your edits from America and United States (disambiguation) since, in both cases, the links went to an article that no longer exists and simply redirects to Superpower, which is not necessary on either disambiguation page. - Wildnox 04:02, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

India[edit]

Just wanted to tell you that no-one is denying India's status, but the status is mentioned in the Politics section, and for a featured article like India, we really must focus on whether edits fit in or not. And the way the emerging superpower link is being pushed in the first sentence of the article is unsuitable. By the way, see Talk:Superpower and sign up for the upcoming WikiProject if you want... Nobleeagle (Talk) 23:37, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comfort women[edit]

I am completly ignorant in this question, but if the cited sources only talk about the Chinease and Koreans than he is entitled to his edits, if not then not. Please provide a citation rather than edit war. Please disregard my message if the citation is already provided. abakharev 00:42, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. Examples of your troublesome edits: labelling the Republic of China as a "potential superpower" and deleting content from American-born Chinese with the given reason "Not designed for forming romantic relationships; Chinese american women prefer caucasian men in order to assimilate into society." If you continue adding content that is blatant nonsense or deleting content under blatantly bogus claims, you will be blocked without further warning. Please consider making constructive edits and referencing any claims subject to dispute. --Jiang 02:57, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]