User talk:Blue2433

Of the three cases you note--Zelman v Simmons-Harris, Gideon v Wainwright, or Ogden v Saunders--Zelman is most in need of work. It mentions specifically that it could use work. I would go with that one. Boolean lint (talk) 20:11, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 23 November[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Zelman v. Simmons-Harris page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]