User talk:BlueUndigo12

January 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to War and Peace has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: War and Peace was changed by BlueUndigo12 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.925494 on 2016-01-28T09:01:09+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:01, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Recent edits to War and Peace

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, War and Peace, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 09:45, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016

Hello, I'm Boing! said Zebedee. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Marie Thérèse of France without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't edit war over reverts of your changes - if you make a change and it is reverted, please discuss it at the article talk page and seek a consensus, and do not just re-impose your change Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:04, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at World human population. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. A statistic claimed to be "as of February 2016" is obviously incorrect, so please do not re-insert it Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:06, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for persistent disruptive editing and abuse of multiple accounts. It seems clear that you are just randomly removing things, randomly reverting edits, and leaving meaningless nonsense on user talk pages - none of which is constructive. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:07, 28 January 2016 (UTC)