User talk:Bluedawe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

First off, welcome! It's always nice to be the one to start a discussion page. I'm here to thank you for the image you added (the PowerMac G4). I'm not really all that active on Wikipedia these days but a thank you and thumbs-up never goes amiss. -- grm_wnr Esc 16:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your warm welcome to Wiki. Your message is a soothing balm after the Wiki community quickly deleted the page which I created, because I thought it was requested - the topic appeared on the Requested Articles Page! I have generally found Wiki-editors incredibly rude, dismissive and arrogant, with the haughty, cavalier manner of smart-alec undergrads. SDG Bluedawe 21:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC) 21 April 07[reply]

--- Welcome!

Hello, Bluedawe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! 

Is everything OK?[edit]

Hi, I hope you got my reply on my talk page OK. Is everything alright now with the infobox on the article? I just wanted to check, as I've lost track of the article. Thanks. Chevymontecarlo 14:16, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your useful edits to this page. There is (rightly or wrongly) a convention that railway lines in Aust are titled xxx railway line, State (or city). This had been extensively discussed in the past (if only I could find the discussion), so I have moved the page back so that it is consistant with other railway line articles. MrHarper (talk) 22:52, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Argonauts[edit]

Hi Bluedawe,

I've just read your interview transcript and posted some thoughts on the Argonauts Club talk page under your contribution. Thanks for the wonderful glimpse of a past era. Myles325a (talk) 10:01, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ross Campbell Daddy Are You Married.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ross Campbell Daddy Are You Married.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 20:39, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    • Dear Dashbot. Thank you for looking after me. If only had this level of care and attention in my day-to-day life. It's true that I uploaded the pic before I wrote the article. I confess, and my sin is before me. I will be better in future, I'll go straight, strike me pink if I don't, gov. I wonder if in days to come bots will turn up in our private lives with cheery messages like 'We have detected that you are a friendless loser and have scheduled you for termination. If you believe you should be unterminated, then [Java script void].' Bluedawe 21:00, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Michael Rush (rower), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ashby, Starter and William Hickey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awww... Another bot looking after me. How I'd love to hear a kind word from a real, live human being, but after all, this is Wikipedia, perhaps the locus for all surly narcissism in the cosmos.

Plankwall[edit]

Hi Bluedawe;

I just noticed your article Slab hut. I study historic carpentry and traditional building methods. I have been planning an article on vertical plankwall construction in the U.S. which is very similar to slab construction. I believe the words plank and slab are synonymous in American English and Australian English. I do not think anyone knows the European origin of this construction in the U.S. but vertical plank walled timber frame (plank frame) buildings were used extensively in the Plymouth Colony and in Rhode Island from the early 17th century. The U.S. also has a thinner wall, 1.25 inch vertical boards with minimal framing called a "boxed house" and many other names. These were more common after the American Civil War.

I will read your article carefully. Thanks for the large bibliography, too. Jim Derby (talk) 01:09, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Jim: I hope you find my article of use. May I also refer you to my article about Bush carpentry which has more to say about Australian vernacular timber construction. My only comment on the use of the word 'plank' would be that in Australia the term is usually used of a set length of properly shaped and sawn timber, or better still, milled. 'Slab' by contrast refers to a more roughly prepared length, e.g. pit-sawn, and adze-smoothed, or perhaps the long offcuts from a trunk on its first pass through the saw table. I had a look in my old Webster's Dictionary, which seems to support this 'milled' definition of 'plank' in US usage. Definitions of 'plank' and 'slab' in my Macquarie Dict. Aust. Lang. say nothing about sawing at all! However, this is not to say that properly milled planks were not used in slab-hut construction where they were available; it is most certainly the case where contemporary slab-huts are built, e.g. a city-dweller's week-end rural retreat where the municipal building codes are less likely to apply. The contemporary home I show on the Wiki article used 'slabs', but the owner and builder both described these as 'very thick, heavy, hardwood planks', and they came from a timber mill. The gaps between the slabs/planks, by the way, were filled in with foam-rubber strips. Stephen Gard aka Bluedawe 01:37, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Slab hut[edit]

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Slab hut you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Teb00007 -- Teb00007 (talk) 14:17, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Michael Rush (rower)[edit]

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Michael Rush (rower) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 16:27, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Michael Rush (rower)[edit]

The article Michael Rush (rower) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Michael Rush (rower) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 20:36, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the work you have done on this. Unfortunately, I am currently suffering from concussion (stupid wall, jumping out at me like that), and so it will be a few days before I can look through the changes you have made and give you any further feedback. Sorry for the inconvenience! Harrias talk 08:22, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've made some further comments on the article at the GA review. Harrias talk 10:04, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bush carpentry[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bush carpentry you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 15:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bush carpentry[edit]

The article Bush carpentry you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Bush carpentry for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 19:27, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GAN for Slab Hut[edit]

Just wanted to know if you were still around. I saw another editor started the review back in August and it didn't go anywhere, so seeing the article yesterday, I decided to jump in.--ColonelHenry (talk) 17:02, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I know you said you wouldn't be able to get around to this until sometime this month, but I just thought I'd pop my head in and remind you about this. Harrias talk 16:31, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you. Have not forgotten. Will be back at desk and task on Monday 8 October next. Bluedawe 20:27, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Michael Rush (rower) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:57, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks, BracketBot, all fixed. You're my hero. Bluedawe 22:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Michael Rush (rower) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • <ref group="n.">George Towns had retired and forfeited his championship to his brother Charles. {{cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article14867927 |title=BOWING. |newspaper=[[Sydney_
  • Journalists commented repeatedly on Rush's open and honest manner – 'the genial Mick Rush'<ref>[{{cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article122600996 |title=DEATH OF MICHAEL RUSH. |

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:08, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Slab hut[edit]

The article Slab hut you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Slab hut for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ColonelHenry -- ColonelHenry (talk) 00:33, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have a disability which prevents me responding to any communication that uses the inane salutation 'hi'. Bluedawe 20:33, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Bluedawe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Bluedawe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hurstville, New South Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Rush (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature[edit]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature is also causing Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links.

You are encouraged to change

<strong>[[User:Bluedawe|<span style="color:MidnightBlue;">Bluedawe</span>]]</strong> : Bluedawe

to

<strong>[[User:Bluedawe|<span style="color: MidnightBlue">Bluedawe</span>]]</strong> : Bluedawe

This can be further simplified, but it can affect the thickness of the link underline, depending on combinations of browser and Wiki skin:

[[User:Bluedawe|<strong style="color: MidnightBlue">Bluedawe</strong>]] : Bluedawe

Anomalocaris (talk) 01:42, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Bluedawe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Hullo BlueDawe

There is good information about the sculler Charles A.Messenger in "The Master" by Sean Fagan and Dally Messenger III, Hachette Livre Let us know when you have written you book on the rowers Gladiator-Citizen (talk) 03:24, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not recall if I replied to you. My book about scullers in early Sydney is titled 'Port Jackson Pullers' ISBN 9780992475109. It is available from my website www.stephengard.com.au
Bluedawe Bluedawe 01:07, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Responding to an old question[edit]

In 2019, you posted a question on the talk page for the Tad Dorgan article. I have answered it. DS (talk) 14:18, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]