User talk:Bluenotetote

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ricco Wright. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. ➜Gƒoley Four (GSV) 20:30, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ricco Wright. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Jarkeld (talk) 13:27, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ricco Wright, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Jarkeld (talk) 13:28, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ricco Wright. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. MonoALT (talk) 02:40, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Ricco Wright, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! ➜Gƒoley Four (GSV) 23:16, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied Ricco Wright

Hi. I just thought you should know that your article Ricco Wright did not appear to satisfy Wikipedia:Notability even though the subject seems to be a great person. It's unfortunate really since it seemed so well written, but alas there was an overwhelming majority decision to delete the article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricco Wright. Only at the last moment did I managed to persuade them to userfy or move the article into your user space rather than delete it, so you will be able to see your article at User:Bluenotetote/Ricco Wright. I hope this doesn't discourage you from contributing to Wikipedia in the future. You're a good writer and I got to say I admired the presentation of the article regardless. Regards —CodeHydro 01:05, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's well written in many ways, and many new articles are clumsily written. But a biographical article should not go into minute biographical details of elementary and secondary education and the like before saying much about what the person's contributions are or what he is notable for. Michael Hardy (talk) 17:05, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]