User talk:Blur4760~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello, Blur4760~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Kukini 00:21, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic Conventions[edit]

You seem to have some input you want to contribute to the Olympic medals pages! Why don't you go here and debate on what the conventions should be. Thanks. --Jared ^[T]/_[+] 14:49, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if that should be listed there. Now that I see it, it seems more of a talk page issue. But the conventions page I started deals with the much bigger issue of how we should display the results....by medal type, by total, or other. If you feel that you want to chime into our discussion, for any aspect...or feel thHat you have a topic to add, feel free to join in. --Jared ^[T]/_[+] 15:08, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Official languages[edit]

As you may see from my note on the NZSL page, English (of any form) has never been given official language status because of its uncontentious nature. The official language status for NZSL and Maori is really about acknowledging minority, and I'd assume that in countries where bilingualism is common (such as Canada or Switzerland), it's important to codify a framework. Sadly, the amount of reo spoken in New Zealand means that there is little chance of English being accorded official language status anytime soon! --Limegreen 02:56, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2006 FIFA World Cup[edit]

Hallo Blur4760, it's nice that you correct spelling, but in the case of "FIFA Fussball WM" it is spelled with ss, because the FIFA organisation is Switzerland-based. Reference (german). I've already corrected it. Bye! --Tantalos 19:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Diacritics in Rosa-Luxemburg-Strasse article[edit]

I put back the diacritics in the article without looking at the history, I am sorry about that, but now that I have done it, I think it looks better than before, and I hope you don't mind. Blur4760 11:37, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I was overreacting to remove them all. I guess I don't really mind that some words have diacritics and some words use only the 26 letters, even on the same page. But I certainly do not like it when a single word or phrase has only half the diacritics it should, I know how ridiculus that looks in Icelandic words. In any case, þanks for taking an interest and I was also very grateful for your comment at Talk:Voss-strasse, it meant that somebody can understand what I write. Stefán Ingi 12:01, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Voss-strasse[edit]

The source for that sentence is my own observation. If that isn't sufficient you can delete it, to the detriment of the article, but of course no-one at Wikipedia thinks that's very important, do they?
I believe the Wikipedia standard for German names is to use the German title (see Axel Freiherr von dem Bussche-Streithorst, Berthold Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg, Ulrich Wilhelm Graf Schwerin von Schwanenfeld Heinrich Graf von Lehndorff-Steinort and many others. Adam 05:35, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the research, Blur. :) And yes, if it's convenient, could you please dig up the Lonely Planet guide? If nothing else, we can then list the guide as a solid reference on the page, plus it'll give us another point of reference on how the name of the street is spelled in an English-language work. --Elonka 19:56, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, since I had a book-signing today that was near the travel section in a bookstore, I took the opportunity to check through some of the Lonely Planet guides, and did indeed find an English-language reference in Lonely Planet:Berlin (where the street was spelled as "Vossstrasse"). Thanks for pointing me in that direction, --Elonka 05:34, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy[edit]

Hi there! I've noticed that you've edited articles pertaining to the Eastern Orthodox Church. I wanted to extend an invitation to you to join the WikiProject dedicated to organizing and improving articles on the subject, which can be found at: WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy. This WikiProject was begun because a need was perceived to raise the level of quality of articles on Wikipedia which deal with the Eastern Orthodox Church.

You can find information on the project page about the WikiProject, as well as how to join and how to indicate that you are a member of the project. Additionally, you may be interested in helping out with our collaboration of the month. I hope you'll consider joining and thank you for your contributions thus far! —A.S. Damick ^talk ^contribs 03:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Berlin government[edit]

Thanks for that. If I follow you correctly, the Oberburgermister was, as it were, the Prime Minister of the city - the head of the administration - while the Stadtpresident was, as it were, the Speaker or head of the City Council. Is that correct? This raises the question - did the Berlin Senate or a city council under another name, exist under the Nazis? What was it called? How were its members chosen? Adam 12:04, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The Germans do have a talent for opaque administrative terminology, do they not? Adam 12:53, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Veronica Mars[edit]

Trivia is inherently non-encyclopaedic (see WP:AVTRIV) - I keep removing trivia that doesn't have enough connection and relevance to episodes as I see it but people are adding it en-mass, and this is a reason people are using to try and get episode articles deleted. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 14:10, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You and I know all this as Veronica Mars fans but your average Joe doesn't, that's why we must provide citations for relevancy (and to make things factual, etc) - this stops the relentless people who will pull at anything to try and get episode articles deleted. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 14:16, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tristan DuGrey[edit]

Thanks for the better phrasing...I've been a GG fan since season one, and usually I can write factoids like that well, but I didn't know how to work it. Thanks! Nate 06:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: King of Bavaria; Duke in Bavaria; Douglas D. Osheroff; Karin Resetarits; Annemasse; Lothar de Maizière; Otto Braun; Mallory Dent; Federal Court of Justice of Germany; Wilhelm Cuno; Franz Beckenbauer; Vincenzo Iaquinta; Sigismund of Bavaria; TVN (Poland); Malmedy; Albert VI of Bavaria; Vincenzo Natali; Arlanda Express; Benjamin Sehene

Cleanup: List of rulers of Bavaria; Vincent Clemmons; Adversarial system
Merge: Golden Axe; Constitutional democracy; Topographic map
Add Sources: Colonization of Africa; Gregg Alexander; The Trial
Wikify: February Patent; Spanish property bubble; Wicked Wisdom
Expand: Gatow; Johann Baptista Ruffini; Chad Michael Murray

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 04:50, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mozart German?[edit]

After reading all the good points brought up in that discussion, I can see that the logic is circular and the debating could go on forever. It would seem most reasonable to me to consider Mozart both German AND Austrian, as both sides present equally solid arguments. It might be a good idea to include Mozart in the Germany article with an explanatory footnote. Sicilianmandolin 23:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Filbinger[edit]

Dear Blur, even though we do not yet agree, I want to tell you that I do consider you a serious contributer to WP and to the Filbinger discussion as well. (I cannot say the same for Dysmo and especially not for Dysmo). I have asked a linguist friend of mine to comment - maybe she can help. Cheers, Str1977 ^{(smile back)} 17:30, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Just to make myself clear...[edit]

Fair enough. I already had to explain myself so many times that I didn't stop to check that you were one of the ones that already got it. --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 22:44, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for arbitration[edit]

You have been named in a request for arbitration at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Commonwealth_realms. Jonathan David Makepeace 00:49, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please vote![edit]

Hi,

Since you've been involved in the recent discussions at Talk:Commonwealth Realm, your vote would be appreciated on this proposal. Thanks. -- Hux 10:41, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You discussed the name of Vossstrasse the last time it came up; you may be interested in doing so again. See Talk:Voßstraße#Page_name. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 00:07, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Blur4760,

Mit den neuen Informationen aus dem Encyclopedia Britannica, könnte ich Sie überzeugen Ihre Stimme bei dieser Wahl zu ändern?

Mit freundlichen Grüssen,

Jonathan David Makepeace 22:29, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, no conspiratorial German, but I have added citations from the Commonwealth Law Bulletin (published by the Commonwealth Secretariat) and the Cambridge Law Journal (published by Cambridge University Press). Would they convince you to change your vote? Thank you for your consideration. Jonathan David Makepeace 21:14, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

vote on decapitalizing Commonwealth R/realm[edit]

A vote has been called on the decapitalization of "r" in "Commonwealth R/realm." Jonathan David Makepeace 00:50, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Monarchy articles[edit]

Blur4760- I see you've been involved in the editing of Canadian monarchy and on its talk page. There's presently a poll going on regarding the format of the titles for all Commonwealth realm monarchy articles. If you'd like to register an opinion, please do so here. Cheers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by G2bambino (talk • contribs) 16:01, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Friedrich Kellner[edit]

I am repeating here a message I just placed on your German page. Some months ago, on the German Friedrich Kellner Wikiquote page you had pointed out some possible errors in my reading of the original Suetterlin script of my grandfather's diary. You were certainly right, and I am grateful to you for catching these errors. I have gone over each of your questions about this, and I have made the corresponding corrections to the Wikiquotes. I am sorry it has taken me so long to make the corrections. I am more often on the English Kellner page than on the German one. Thank you for your help. I do appreciate it. ScottRskellner (talk) 19:53, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Blur4760. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Blur4760~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

22:37, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed[edit]

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

11:08, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]