User talk:Bob isat

This is Bob isat's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Anticor has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Anticor. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply.

I read your corresponding comment 'This is a GIGANTIC largely unsourced wall of text and their own website is not an independent source. Theroadislong (talk) 19:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)'[reply]

Concerning the unsourced stuffs, will it be OK if i add as many references to press articles (in french) as the french wikipage ?

Can you explain what you mean by "their own website is not independant"? Is it required to have a own website created by someone else?

For example the wikipedia page of Global Organization of Parliamentarians Against Corruption has links to the website of http://www.gopacnetwork.org/, which is their own website.

In any case, i would be glad to read you in order to improve this draft.

Kind Regards,

bob isat Bob isat (talk) 19:36, 22 May 2022 (UTC) Bob isat (talk) 19:35, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anticor (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anticor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anticor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 21:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bob isat! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – robertsky (talk) 21:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anticor (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Suggest trimming down to a stub as most of it is unsourced and there is way too much detail for an encyclopedia article. Only include content that can be sourced to a secondary, independent, reliable source where Anticor is a prime subject of the source. To meet the notability guidelines, need in-depth coverage about the organization from multiple sources meeting to same criteria listed above (secondary, independent, reliable). What they say about themselves or those affiliated with them say about them is not usable so their website, their comments, interviews, etc. is not usable for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anticor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anticor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 21:18, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anticor (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Anticor, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bob isat/Anticor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:46, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Anticor has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Anticor. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:53, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anticor (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more references especially from places not associated with Anticor.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anticor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 02:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Bob isat/Anticor

Hello, Bob isat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Bob isat/Anticor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Bob isat/Anticor

Hello, Bob isat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anticor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:48, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]