User talk:Bobanny

Dimensions of Chinatown, Vancouver

Hi Lani, don't know if you're active in wikipedia or not right now, but thought you'd be the person to ask to look up the actual physical area and wahtever civic statistics there are on Chinatown-proper - see [conversation] re a NYC editor who 's been changing content to downplay the existence / relevance of other Chinatowns than his own....the only way to effectively battle such people is with statistics/citations.......as far as physical reaa goes, I might be able to use the provincial basemap's tools to calculate an area for the Chinatown BIA; but I think most Vancouverites would tend to include Strathcona as part of Chinatown - your thoughts on that? I also think that some statements that while certain other areas of the city are predominantly Chinese in retail and residential character - Kingsway, South Fraser, South Victoria - they are not considered to be part of Chinatown, or to be Chinatowns.....that's hard to cite of course....the Chinatown BIA website doesn't have precise details, or much useful history in fact...so I'm wondering what you might know of, or could dig up.....Skookum1 (talk) 13:09, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Larwill Park

Just made this as a start - figure you can probably add stuff on labour rallies/riots, 1930s and other matters, seemed like this was needed a long time ago.....Skookum1 (talk) 18:58, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

The 20th anniversary of the massacre is upcoming, and I have been moved to update the articles a bit, since I imagine there will be media coverage and general interest, including by those who are too young to remember when it happened. Incredible that, really. My researches led me to this disturbing website [1]; good reason to keep improving the article, in my view! If you have time or the interest to take a look and exercise your magic, I would be very grateful. No worries if not, though!! --Slp1 (talk) 00:22, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vancouver

Dear Bobanny, are you around these days? If so, let me know, because I am requesting your help once again. Mkdw ^talk 10:32, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Woodward's re decay of Downtown Eastside

Hi Bobanny; please see Talk:Woodward's#The_decay_of_the_Downtown_Eastside....I said I'd try and dig up some sources but I'm sure you're better equipped and more knowledgeable about what's in print....Skookum1 (talk) 04:50, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Squares in Birmingham, England

CfD nomination of Category:Streets in Birmingham, England

IRC Channel for WikiProject Law Enforcement

I've proposed an IRC channel on the Freenode IRC network for WikiProject Law Enforcement. Several WikiProjects have done this (seeWP:IRC). My comments are located on the Project discussion page,[2]. Thanks! --→James Kidd (contr/talk/email) 07:30, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Squares and plazas by city

File permission problem with File:SolidarityPoster.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:SolidarityPoster.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:36, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article for deletion from WikiProject Law Enforcement

Could you guys ask members of the WikiPrject Law Enforcement to take a look at the article about Morganza Police Department and weigh in on its nomination for deletion? Sf46 (talk) 20:09, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Hear speak see no evil Toshogu cropped enhanced.jpg

The file File:Hear speak see no evil Toshogu cropped enhanced.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused crop

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:42, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:G-Men movie 1935.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:G-Men movie 1935.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 18:37, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ned McGowan

The article Ned McGowan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Committee of Vigilance

A tag has been placed on Committee of Vigilance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

{{db-afc-move|1=Draft:Committee_of_Vigilance}}

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Qcne (talk) 14:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]