User talk:Bojo1498/Archives/2017/January

Kaabil Soundtrack was correctly updated why are you reverting back to the old version

Would love to see you doing some research before reverting

Hey there. I've yet to see anyone provide a source to support the addition. If you can provide a reliable source, feel more than free to add it. But please do not simply keep reverting my edits. This is edit warring. The onus is on the person adding content to provide a source, not for the person reviewing the edits to prove otherwise. --hwalk | talk | contribs 19:10, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

Hi Bojo, You removed the finisher because you feel it doesn't count because it dint count so why don't you go to the page of evolution and removed the finisher triple powerbomb because it's the same case as lana only because they used it once or twice it dosent as their finisher. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.215.32 (talk) 23:24, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Hey there. I am far from an expert on wrestling, but I do know a little bit, which is why I reverted your addition. I'd encourage you to be bold and fix the other article if you feel like it should be removed. Just make sure you back up your changes with a reason in the edit summary. I'd also encourage you to look at the Talk page guidelines and put your new talk page sections at the bottom of pages and sign your posts. Let me know if you have any questions. Happy editing! --hwalk | talk | contribs 23:34, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Then go to the page of evolution and remove the finisher of triple powerbomb. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.215.32 (talk) 15:57, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Wow so you removed this one but not the one in evolution page which is the same argument you said just because you use a move once or twice dosent mean it's their finisher they only use the triple powerbomb twice — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.215.32 (talk) 14:42, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

As I said before, I encourage you to make the change yourself. I'm not interested in going around auditing the pages of wrestlers to see how many times they've used a specific move. You are more than welcome to do so, but I don't believe that is a good use of my time since my knowledge of wrestling is pretty limited. I feel my time is better spent monitoring the pages on my watchlist and reviewing pending changes. Also, please sign your posts! Happy editing! --hwalk | talk | contribs 18:27, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Of course because you know I'm right so you don't want to admit that I'm right, so I'm gonna leave it here because I'm not gonna waste my time to fight with a person like you who has double standards with certain situations and dosent admit when a person is right so congratulations Bojo you prove my point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.215.32 (talk) 19:25, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

I have no idea what "your point" is that I'm proving, exactly. If you disagreed with my initial reversion, then you should have said that instead of immediately telling me to edit another page. I generally operate under the principal that content already on a page is good (unless it is actively being disputed), so additions or removals need extra scrutiny. If you have an edit that is reverted, and you disagree, take it up on that page's talk page. That is where content disputes should happen. If your change is a good one, it will be backed up by other editors there. Hopefully this clarifies everything. If you still have any questions, feel free to ask me. --hwalk | talk | contribs 19:36, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Production Companies

Why do you keep removing them? People added them cause they are part of the show. It's been aroumd for a very long time97.106.151.168 (talk) 17:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Can you give me a diff that shows what you are talking about? More than likely, I reverted the addition of them because they didn't have a source backing up the addition. It's much more likely I reverted an addition rather than removing them. If you give me a diff, or at least tell me what page you are talking about, I can give you an explanation. Thanks and happy editing! --hwalk | talk | contribs 17:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

GoT and Channel Zero. There are production companies that were first shown and then somebody removed them.97.106.151.168 (talk) 22:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Yeah. I just took a look at one of my edits, and it was as I was guessing. It was an unsourced addition. If you have a source to support that addition, you are more than welcome to add it back. --hwalk | talk | contribs 03:55, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Reference problem

How do you add a reference for a change I made when there is not exactly a news article to reference but its clear on that company website.

For this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rover's_Morning_Glory

I was adding under stations WZZR/Palm Beaches

Its clearly on their site and is true

http://wzzr.iheart.com/onair/rovers-morning-glory-56668/

http://wzzr.iheart.com

71.145.231.31 (talk) 17:44, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Hey there. I'd use http://wzzr.iheart.com/onair/ if anything, since it mentions it on the schedule. --bojo | talk | contribs 15:04, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Mango

Please justify your sumamryy reversion of my edits on mango. Plantsurfer 19:11, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

@Plantsurfer sure. I reverted your edit because the article is summarizing mangoes. It isn't talking about a specific one (which "A mango" implies, whereas "The mango" does not). Happy editing! --bojo | talk | contribs 19:16, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

with respect you have the English grammar backwards. 'The' is the definite article, referring to a specific article. A is the indefinite article. Plantsurfer 19:20, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

@Plantsurfer:, I see what you are saying, but take a look at other articles such as Apple or Orange. They all start with "the". If you want to have a large, drawn-out linguistic debate, we could certainly do that, but let's just follow consensus instead ^-^. Happy editing!--bojo | talk | contribs 19:26, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

@Bojo1498: there is an important difference, which is that those articles both refer to single botanical species, whereas mangoes come from a number of species. There is therefore no "the" mango, and the first sentence of the lead itself acknowledges this. Plantsurfer 19:35, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

@Plantsurfer: My experience with botany is quite limited. I'd take it up on the talk page and discuss it with people there. --bojo | talk | contribs 19:37, 20 January 2017 (UTC)