User talk:BonJife
December 2017[edit]
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Diane Lane have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:42, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Diane Lane. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Diane Lane, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Diane Lane was changed by BonJife (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.904952 on 2017-12-15T21:46:01+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:46, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at [[:Diane Lane]] shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Beauty School Dropout (talk) 22:14, 15 December 2017 (UTC)