User talk:BonheurFDS

July 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Kemal Kerinçsiz appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Bihco (talk) 21:32, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Turkey Fed Cup team, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. http://www.fedcup.com/en/teams/team/profile.aspx?id=TUR states that the team play in Europe/Africa Zone Group II in 2012. Bihco (talk) 21:34, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 23:13, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BonheurFDS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I feel I am being persecuted with pro-turkey users who are refusing to acknowledge their own country's role in the Armenian genocide and in the theft of land from Cyprus and in the development of modern racism and fascism. Orhan Pamuk was sued by his own countrymen for stating a historical fact. How can the turkish users of the internet be trusted to moderate an important factual resource when they have such a distate for facts? BonheurFDS (talk) 23:17, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Actually you were blocked for edits such as this. Why on earth would EastEnders run a storyline to highlight the dangers of children playing with Turkish people? That is vandalism and that is the reason you were blocked. 5 albert square (talk) 23:29, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

if this is a sockpuppet for all the accounts listed (here), my question is why did you foolishly vandalize the article this as is stated above ... from what i can see of all your sockpuppets they have a good history of doing fine works of removing endless vandalism from wiki (here) (here) ... thus, why would you suddenly start to destroy the same thing (wikipedia) you had been tirelessly helping in the past?--70.162.171.210 (talk) 04:30, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]