User talk:BoratLA

BoratLA, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

The

Adventure

Hi BoratLA!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 03:05, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Clarkcj12. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Peter R. Orszag, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Clarkcj12 (talk) 02:33, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also I do understand why you did that. But it is suitable for Wikipedia as such that it has reliable references to back up the statements please read our Policy on Biographies of Living Person at WP:BLP. Thank you. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 02:35, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that, but their references are fine, as well they link to actual news sources like New York Times. So, please before making a change like that talk to the other major contributors that have edited it in the past, and put it up for WP:RFC to see what the consensus is. Thank you. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 02:50, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Josh3580_talk/hist 02:54, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is New editors edit-warring at Peter R. Orszag. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:37, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]