User talk:BossBabyIndia

Welcome![edit]

Hi BossBabyIndia! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 331dot (talk) 17:14, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks BossBabyIndia (talk) 17:17, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

COI[edit]

I see that you declared a COI, what is the nature of your COI? 331dot (talk) 17:14, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm connected with that officer he's like my mentor BossBabyIndia (talk) 17:16, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you also a police officer? Is he your boss? 331dot (talk) 17:19, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not a police officer also he's not my boss. BossBabyIndia (talk) 17:20, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hey, can you help me to approve? BossBabyIndia (talk) 04:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ravinder Singal (February 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We need independent reliable sources with significant coverage of him to summarize in this article. It might help to better summarize the source stating that people attempted to impersonate him. Once source is not available(#2).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ravinder Singal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 17:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BossBabyIndia! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 331dot (talk) 17:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:DiggisMusic per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DiggisMusic. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:32, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ravinder Singal (February 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Misterrrrr was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ravinder Singal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Misterrrrr (talk) 09:33, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]