Jump to content

User talk:BozellHammer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Nicholas Ballasy. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. | Uncle Milty | talk | 19:45, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Nicholas Ballasy constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content without explanation. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 19:58, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've explained the edits both on the article Talk Page and the edit summary. I've also discussed them on "Uncle Milty"'s Talk Page. The vandalism charge is incorrect. --BozellHammer (talk) 20:00, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gay allegations drudge

[edit]

Hi, please don't replace this content while its under discussion at the BLPN, can you point me to the consensus to include it that you mentioned, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 23:20, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly. Check the Matt Drudge Talk Page, as well as its archives. And I'll be replacing the content, in line with consensus. It might be nice to hear from someone without a history of 3RR blocks. --BozellHammer (talk) 01:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I see no consensus - if you want to discuss and form a consensus then you should do it on the talkpage, if you simply claim one when you desired addition is clearly disputed that would be disruptive imo, but I note your intended comment to simply replace the content without discussion or current consensus and I would in good faith point out to you that your desired addition is disputed and you should follow WP:BRD and move to discussion. Off2riorob (talk) 14:18, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You don't see consensus? You may want to look a little harder. Plenty of consensus was already formed on the Talk page. Judging by your edit history, your numerous edit-war blocks, and your out-of-hand dismissal of reliable sources like the New York Daily News, you're not in the best position to weigh in on this matter. Also the "BLP-end-run" is a long discredited technique 'round these parts. --BozellHammer (talk) 19:28, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts

[edit]

In case it's an issue, remember that blocks apply to an editor not just an account. If you are a blocked editor then you need to get the block lifted before editing with a new account. In not, then not. See WP: Block.   Will Beback  talk  09:17, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]

Hersfold (t/a/c) 21:32, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]