User talk:Bramblenose

This user is in school.

This user is taking a wikibreak and may be away or inactive for varying periods of time.
Although they may occasionally be able to do some editing, messages left for them may not be replied to for a while.
They will be back on Wikipedia when school is over.

SEMI-RETIRED

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

January 2013[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 04:45, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Note for admins: Kuru was the blocking admin, I placed the warnings). Acroterion (talk) 02:28, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bramblenose (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Help! I have been blocked and I don't want to be blocked forever!Bramblenose (talk) 01:26, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Request declined because it doesn't address the user problems that led to the block of both this account and the associated IP. See the guide to appealing blocks for more. Acroterion (talk) 01:43, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bramblenose (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What if I am blocked forever? I don't want to be blocked forever! Please unblock me! If you do I will give you a Barnstar! Note: I will also make my user page back.Bramblenose (talk) 2:04 am, Today (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:05, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not blocked forever - "indefinitely" just means that no specific time has been set. You can be unblocked by making an unblock request that addresses the reason for your block and convinces a reviewing admin that you will be of benefit to the project. So far you have not come close to that. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 03:48, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bramblenose (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not do anything naughty. I have received this message, and I promise to do these things again: *#understand what I have been blocked for, *#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and *#will make useful contributions instead. ? Bramblenose (talk) 23:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you're actually serious about getting unblocked, then a serious unblock request will be required. Your only contributions to this account are on user pages and user talk pages. Exactly what "useful contributions" are you planning on making (specifically)? What articles would you edit? How would you improve them? What exactly do you understand you've been blocked for? All of these questions would need to be answered satisfactorily prior to any unblock. ‑Scottywong | spill the beans _ 00:12, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2013[edit]

I promise this block isn't necessary anymore. I have started my own wiki (not to be mean or anything) with help from wikia so I can let the world know about the fictional characters that I created! Also, it is called the PTH and PTM warriors wiki. It is being advertised on google. Also, please accept the unblock request below! I need Wikipedia to help with my wiki some!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bramblenose (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for about 2 months now. I have came back because I need Wikipedia to help with my wiki, the PTH and PTM Warriors wiki. Please unblock me only so I can do some copying and pasting! That'll be it! Bramblenose (talk) 02:47, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given that this is yet another unblock request that does absolutely nothing to address the reason for your block or explain why the community would benefit from restoring your editing privileges, your talk page access has been revoked. Kinu ^t/_c 03:46, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also, I need Acroterion to restore my user page. He and Kuru have been torturing me ever since the first week of 2013.

I am going to be semi-retired UNTIL I am unblocked.

This blocked user (block log | active blocks | autoblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs | abuse log) has had their talk page access revoked because an administrator has identified this user's talkpage edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. If you would like to make further requests, you may contact the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-appeals-en@lists.wikimedia.org. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Kinu ^t/_c 03:47, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]