User talk:BrennanTorresBreshaunty15

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

BrennanTorresBreshaunty15 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

67.49.184.229 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Block evasion

Blocking administrator: Bsadowski1 (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: See below Nick-D (talk) 09:05, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BrennanTorresBreshaunty15 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here BrennanTorresBreshaunty15 (talk) 05:54, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Please provide a rationale for being unblocked (the Guide to appealing blocks may be helpful). I note that this account was blocked directly for block evasion, so you need to respond to that. Nick-D (talk) 09:05, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is clearly a sock of blocked user Brennan Hanalei Torres. Sorry Brennan, but you were blocked several times for sockpuppetry and vandalism. Any subsequent socks are simply going to be blocked at this point. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:46, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]