User talk:Bridgecraft

This user may have left Wikipedia. Bridgecraft has not edited Wikipedia since January 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Image tagging for Image:Pieter.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pieter.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:09, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Texel-air.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Texel-air.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:11, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Upwind.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Upwind.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:10, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Addendum: please do not copy and paste the text from the template to the page. Instead, use type {{PD-self}} and the template will appear. You may consider reading Wikipedia:How to edit a page; an excellent description of how to edit efficiently using templates is given there. --Iamunknown 03:15, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Upwind.jpg missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Upwind.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:18, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PdlC[edit]

Hoi Bridgecraft,

leuk dat je hier actief bent geweest, het artikel Pieter de la Court is goed op orde :) effeietsanders 20:04, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Krekel van der Woerd Wouterse for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krekel van der Woerd Wouterse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krekel van der Woerd Wouterse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

FOARP (talk) 17:07, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Krekel van der Woerd Wouterse" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Krekel van der Woerd Wouterse and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 30#Krekel van der Woerd Wouterse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sandstein 16:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]