User talk:Brilliant007

August 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Bijou Thaangjam, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 07:25, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ravinder Dutt.JPG

The file File:Ravinder Dutt.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned file with no clear usability on project

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:00, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Bijou Thaangjam

Hello Brilliant007, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Bijou Thaangjam, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. So Why 13:33, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]