User talk:BuddhaShakya

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Singh.sksps, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Gotitbro (talk) 02:12, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BuddhaShakya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

read this book (History of Indian Buddhism: From the Origins to the Saka Era) was written by Étienne Lamotte - Chapter 4 {THE PERIOD OF THE SUNGAS AND YAVANAS => 11. BUDDHISM UNDER THE SUNGAS} /

https://books.google.ca/books/about/History_of_Indian_Buddhism.html?id=sJwEAAAAYAAJ&source=kp_book_description&redir_esc=y

"The History of Indian Buddhism is undoubtedly Lamotte's most brilliant contribution to the field of Buddhist exegesis. The work contains a vivid, vigorous and fully-detailed description of early Buddhism and its teachings, the material organization of the Community, the formation and further developments of Buddhist writings, the conciliar traditions, the evolution of Buddhist sculpture and architecture, the origins of the sects, the Buddhist dialects and the constitution of the legends, and sets them in the historical background in which buddhist doctrines originated and expanded in India and in neighbouring countries. Using material evidence provided by Indian epigraphy and archaeological remains on the one hand, and taking into account information supplied by Western (Latin and Greek) and Far Eastern (Tibetan and Chinese) sources on the other, Lamotte has succeeded in producing a lucid and basic book that is unanimously considered as a classic of contemporary Buddhist studies. After thirty years, the work has retained all its value, but, in order to meet the requirements of recent Buddhist scholarship, the book has been supplemented with an additional bibliography, an index of technical terms and revised geographical maps."

I don't need to prove anything...Persecution of Buddhists is written in all Buddhist monarchies / all over the world / teach in every history department of the universities where the decline of Buddhism is questioned... By defending a massacre /slaughter of ShakyaVanshi Mauryas, Buddhist Monks and those who were a follower of Dhamma, you are gaining nothing... and if you all trying to make Wikipedia a place of wrong information...it will doom very shortly - mark my words BuddhaShakya (talk) 03:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:14, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BuddhaShakya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You blamed me : " I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block" # My First question is...where I damaged the Wikipedia...?... I reverted back the edited comments made by "Gotitbro"...Bcoz I think Gotitbro is trying to hide real facts (well described by earlier editor)... It is well documented in so many scripts about Persecution of Buddhists done by PushyaMitra Sung...So the editor who originally brought this real fact, on Persecution of Buddhists done by PushyaMitra Sung, was damage to Wikipedia...?... I just brought his/her version back as "Gotitbro" was trying to hide the real facts... So you are saying Originally who wrote this fact was damage to Wikipedia (Plz go thru the history of "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Buddhists" page)...??? did You guys even try to investigate the real issue...??? BuddhaShakya (talk) 14:45, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for violating WP:SOCK. Address this and only this in your unblock request. Yamla (talk) 15:00, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BuddhaShakya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"Singh.sksps" is a common account, me & my partner both were using from long back... & When You guys blocked account "Singh.sksps"...I had to create a user "BuddhaShakya" to revert back the original changes...Is that a problem...? BuddhaShakya (talk) 15:29, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request speaks for itself. User is urged to appeal at original account, User talk:Singh.sksps. viz Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Singh.sksps. Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:09, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Of course that's a problem. You are violating WP:EVADE, WP:SOCK, and WP:NOSHARING. You are not eligible for unblock consideration here. Go make the request with your original account. --Yamla (talk) 15:32, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As this account is admitted to be violating WP:SOCK, I have revoked talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 15:33, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That was the purpose of blocking you-- to stop the disruption. Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:06, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]