Jump to content

User talk:Budgelevel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Budgelevel! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 00:39, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

AfC notification: Draft:Marty York has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Marty York. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:01, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there, thanks for the note and for the quick attention to this draft. I've put three sources into the article's talk page as requested. Please let me know if you need anything further, or if there are any issues with the way I submitted them. Budgelevel (talk) 00:09, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there, someone on the live help chat suggested that I check with you about the status of this article you were reviewing: Draft:Marty York
Is it possible to get an update on the status of your review? Thank you in advance Budgelevel (talk) 15:48, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marty York (April 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Budgelevel! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marty York (August 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Bearcat (talk) 12:36, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Bearcat. My understanding from the original reviewer was that the article's content was fine, but that it needed additional sources to demonstrate notability, which I have been discussing with editors on the Talk page and working on providing. I am still new to this and if there was something I did wrong in terms of the process of attempting to resubmit and fix the issue, I apologize and would be happy to correct. No need to imply that I'm not trying to do a good job of improving the submission or not caring about complying with the rules. Budgelevel (talk) 04:42, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marty York has been accepted

[edit]
Marty York, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 12:00, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
The Aafī (talk) 08:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Budgelevel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2022 Blue Jays Ring Pop Proposal Incident, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:04, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topic alert for the Arab Israeli conflict

[edit]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 20:45, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this means that if you had been made aware you should not have made the edit at Mount Sodom

[edit]

It doesn’t matter if you are right or wrong, now that you are aware tou need to use talk pages. But you didn’t know that so no problem, jius be careful in the future. Doug Weller talk 20:47, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]