User talk:BuoyantLoverMoon

December 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Daniel Sansano. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 07:38, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Daniel Sansano. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Ashley yoursmile! 07:47, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to Daniel Sansano. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Victor Schmidt (talk) 13:33, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did with this edit to Daniel Sansano. Victor Schmidt (talk) 13:38, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For the last time, stop removing the deletion notice from the article. While proposed deletion template can be removed by any user, and it cannot be re-added, the articles for deletion process cannot be stopped in this way. The notice must remain on the article as long as the deletion discussion is in progress. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 13:41, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 13:43, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]