Jump to content

User talk:BusinessLawyer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BusinessLawyer (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Abusing multiple accounts? Really.... I have only just come back from a business trip in America and have no idea what you are on about, I have been there for 6 weeks and had no internet access at my hotel accept at my office. If you would like me to confirm this then I will but this is totally out of order that User:Alison seems to think that I am evading a block considering I have no idea what this block is about or anything like that. If I am accused of abusing multiple accounts and block evading can I have some form of evidence to show this because otherwise there is no reason to block me. I hope that this matter can be sorted so that it doesnt have to go any further.

Decline reason:

I find this explanation unconvincing, since this account first edited on May 16th. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 13:48, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sorry, but you are Chris19910 (talk · contribs),  Confirmed by checkuser. No question of it - Alison 14:14, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BusinessLawyer (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I AM NOT THIS USER! I will be taking this to a higher authority then because I am totally shocked by your response Alison I am not this user and you seem to think that I am. I would like to see a report of the checkuser process which I know I am entitled to have and emailed to me. If you think that you blocking me for being a sock of someone I have no idea of then you have another think coming. It is obiously gang up on new users day because whilst looking through the WP:RFU alot of the admins have been very rude with their replies to the unblock requests such as not enough information or obvious sockpuppet. Further more how do I complain about this site? I cant seem to find it anywhere. I will be complaining to a higher authority seen as this checkuser Alsion seems to think that I am a sockpuppet of User:Chris19910 I have looked at this users page and as well as being retired from editing on wikipedia it seems that my username has been added to the list. I request that this been removed from this page.

Decline reason:

Checkuser has confirmed that you are the same user. Evidence supports the checkuser. Blocked sockpuppets almost always insist that they're innocent. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:47, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BusinessLawyer (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Yes what ever you say. I dont believe this and will have Alison's checkuser tools as she has clearly violated the terms of use. I will make sure that she has them removed and will be reporting this case to the press. I have very strong connections with the news channels and also the New York Times I know the editor. Whoops the emails have already been sent. Bad press for wikipedia and the foundation. Now I suggest you unblock me before I take this even further to the Government of The United States. If I am not unblocked I will be making a phone call to the Government department in London.

Decline reason:

I'm sure they'll be happy to have a long conversation with you about it. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 15:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.