User talk:ButOnMethItIs
Welcome
[edit]Hello, ButOnMethItIs, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Message From Xenu Happy editing! Message from XENUcomplaints? leave me a message! 17:42, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
mmm
[edit]Mmmm meth... but what on meth is? C6541 (T↔C) 09:28, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
- What on meth is not? ButOnMethItIs (talk) 22:35, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Airstrike article
[edit]thx Seelefant (talk) 22:09, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Edit War on Afghanistan Wikileaks
[edit]I don't want to get into an edit war, so I won't undo your reversion right away. However, I don't see why you should automatically have the article your way.
- There is an active and on-going discussion which you are part of. At the very least, your removal of that content is premature. ButOnMethItIs (talk) 16:50, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- Leaving it without the offending link is a better default position.128.118.147.160 (talk) 17:03, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- No, it's not. The link adds value to the article and you haven't presented a single policy-based reason why the link should be removed. ButOnMethItIs (talk) 17:05, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- Leaving it without the offending link is a better default position.128.118.147.160 (talk) 17:03, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Stalker Film
[edit]Good day sir. Sorry but I don't understand why my information improvement into the Stalker Film wiki page has been considered as Vandalism. I've just added information about a possible Stalker film based on the game (which has components from the film) and about a nice project which will be able to be watched in English too... I've even add references and links to prove the information veracity. Can you please reconsider your decision and undo the edition?
As for the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Games, STALKERHispano is a Spanish Community checked world wide, so I bet yes, it's an very important link even for an English user (we often translate some exclusives news or interviews into English).
Anyway, if I'm wrong (I've studied English but of course I can't understand it as a native), good job ;)
Good Day! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.33.144.177 (talk) 21:37, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, I saw the name "Uwe Boll" in the most recent edit and I hit the vandalism rollback button. I should have looked more carefully and used the regular rollback button. But STALKERHispano is not a reliable source of information and we don't usually link to fansites (#11). Also, nothing you posted was related to the 1979 Stalker film. If you find reliable sources for a future S.T.A.L.K.E.R. film, please see about adding the information to S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl#Legacy. ButOnMethItIs (talk) 08:40, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Dade: I see, thanks you for your time! About a STALKER film, google 'Monolith's Whisper'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.33.144.177 (talk) 14:35, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Re: List of video games notable for negative reception
[edit]Why do you consider it original research? ViperSnake151 Talk 14:59, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
- The rationale is laid out on that article's talk page. The OR template now points to the section. ButOnMethItIs (talk) 15:02, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 23:15, 3 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
causa sui (talk) 23:15, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Don't add template for WP:VER where it's easy to find sources for one of classic games of Atari, Thanks. Sir Lothar (talk) 21:39, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Assessing redirects (WPVG)
[edit]Just a quick note to remind that WPVG doesn't assess redirects. I've fixed up this edit. :) Salvidrim! 14:11, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]For two things really. First of all thank you very much for the attention you've been giving to the sources-related discussion at WT:VG/S. I notice you're targeting the ones that haven't yet been discussed this go-around so you're really helping where it's needed. Thanks very much for that. The other thing I wanted to say thanks for is in sourcing the SF-1 SNES TV and the C1 NES TV articles with that recent Plunkett review on Kotaku. I'd been hunting for a ref for the magazine screenshot tidbit for quite a while now. So thanks for finally getting it squared away. Cheers, -Thibbs (talk) 22:12, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Editor's Barnstar |
| Congratulations, ButOnMethItis, you've recently made your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia!
Thanks for all your hard work on improving, expanding, and assessing video game articles. Keep it up! :) Maryana (WMF) (talk) 19:39, 25 April 2012 (UTC) |
- I've been seeing you around WP:VG a lot for months, how the heck are you only totalling some ~2000 edits?! O.o Salvidrim! 20:14, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
May 2012
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 May 23, is considered bad practice, even if you meant it well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 14:34, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry. I don't know what I was thinking there. ButOnMethItIs (talk) 14:43, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 17:02, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Video game platform discussion
[edit]Hi there! As someone who participated in the "platform" discussion at WikiProject Video games, you are probably well aware of the complexities involved in the issue. Thus far we've discussed quite a few points but haven't come to any firm conclusions. One of the participants has suggested that we hold a !vote. Please share your thoughts on how we should proceed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Starting a !vote. If you would like to !vote, one of the participants has already provided several options. Thanks for your help! CaseyPenk (talk) 16:24, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2013
[edit]
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue 
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2013, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)