User talk:But they never asked?

Blocked indefinitely: disruptive editing at talk pages, from the outset; clearly already knows their way around Wikipedia warning procedures, no other contributions. -- The Anome (talk) 18:58, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

But they never asked? (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, I was not being disruptive I was only was only saying that I was sorry for doing the personal attacks and why I was confused about why they gave straight into my 3 warning and about to comment on content or people thing. Sorry I will stop being disruptive and edit in the correct way. Some of those edits were tests. I looked at the warning procedure thing when I got my warning. I Get REALLY annoyed sometime so please put that into Consideration. But they never asked? (talk) 19:03, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

CU confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. You are a sockpuppet. If anything, should you ever decide to be non-disruptive, you need to return to your original account and begin the process to request an unblock from there. Seeing how much time-wasting you have already performed with other accounts, I'm revoking your talk page access. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:35, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Jannik Schwaß: Please do not comment on unblock requests. This should be between the user and the administrator reviewing the unblock. –eggofreason^talk 19:28, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jannik SchwaB: That was a test edit I did not mean to cause harm. But they never asked? (talk) 19:30, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]