User talk:BuySomeApples
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Reviewer approval
[edit]Hey BuySomeApples! I don't think you remember me, but you did review some of my articles and gave me my first barnstar! I'm planning on submitting an application to WP:AFC/P to become a reviewer. I had submitted an application previously, but I had no experience at the time. I now feel ready, but I still can't assure that. I came to you because you seem to be a professional at reviewing. Could you check my stats (xtools, pages made, logs, afd, contributions) and tell me whether you think my work and experience could get my application accepted? I'd only be working in WP:VG. Awaiting your response, MKsLifeInANutshell (talk) 17:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
The article Weaponized incompetence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No citations to reputable sources in psychiatry or psychology. Entirely based on popular culture and tabloid references, with little-to-no evidence backing them.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Maximum Limelihood Estimator 03:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Weaponized incompetence for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weaponized incompetence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.–Sincerely, A Lime 23:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
[edit] | |
| Three years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:26, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
"Tonies" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Tonies has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 8 § Tonies until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 22:46, 8 August 2024 (UTC)