User talk:Buzzbuzzwili

토론 먼저 하세요

위키백과에서는 토론이 먼저입니다. 함부로 바꿔대는 건 자제하시기 바랍니다. 한국어 위키백과에서는 이런 규칙이 느슨한 편인데 영어판에선 이게 매우 엄격하게 적용됩니다. --117.53.77.84 (talk) 06:50, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

대한민국 노동당

대한민국 노동당은 원칙적으로 반자본주의 정당이고 이건 사회민주주의와 중도좌파의 범위를 넘어서는 급진좌파 성향에 해당하는 겁니다. --117.53.77.84 (talk) 09:28, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

또한 당 강령을 직접적으로 인용해 출처로 사용하는 것은 불가능합니다. 위키백과는 특정 정당의 블로그가 아니기 때문입니다. --117.53.77.84 (talk) 09:44, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

노동당은 통진당, 정의당과 달리 NL파가 없는 순수 PD파들의 연합 정당이라 그 스펙트럼이 다양합니다. 중도좌파부터 급진좌파까지요, 노동당에서 사회민주주의 센터도 있을 정도입니다.

사회민주주의를 표방하는 사람들도 많기때문에 중도좌파는 추가하지 않되, 사회민주주의와 빅텐트(포괄정당)를 추가하도록 하겠습니다.

자꾸 'PD'를 고집하시는 이유가 궁금한데 여긴 영어 위키백과입니다. 그냥 PD라고 해버리면 여기 사람들은 이해를 못하죠. 다소 번거롭더라도 People's Democracy라는 표현을 정확히 사용해 주시기 바랍니다. --117.53.77.84 (talk) 13:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

People's Democracy 는 일종의 이념인데, 여기서말하는 People's Democracy 는 이념이 아닌 정치분파를 말합니다. PD파라고 해서 그시절 운동권때처럼 죄다 인민민주주의(People's Democracy)자가 아니거든요. 노동당이 무슨정당인지 모르는 사람들은 잘못 이해할 수 있다는 겁니다.

그리고 노동당은 중도좌파가 아닐지 몰라도 진보신당은 맞습니다. 현재 정의당에 있는 사람들도 과거 대다수가 진보신당 당원들이였어요, 현 노동당이 급진적으로 변하게된건 사회당과 합당한 이후부터입니다. 진보신당 강령에는 반자본주의같은 급진적인 문장도 없습니다.

PD 자체가 People's Democracy의 약자잖아요. 결국 둘 자체는 같은 단어죠. 그렇다면 영어 화자들이 더 잘 이해할 수 있는 후자를 쓰는 것이 더 좋다고 생각됩니다. 대한민국 사회주의 운동의 역사에 관심이 없다면 'PD' 만으로는 그 의미를 이해하는 것이 불가능하단 건 그쪽도 잘 알고 있을 것입니다. --117.53.77.84 (talk) 07:15, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

또한 진보신당도 메인스트림 중도좌파의 범위를 초과하는 급진적 노선을 제시하고 있는 것이 사실이므로(비록 강령에 반자본주의 문장이 없다 하더라도) 중도좌파라고 서술하기는 어렵습니다. 그리고 정의당원 중에서 진보신당 출신은 대다수가 아니라 일부겠죠. 나머지 대다수는 친노 국참당계와 NL 인천연합 출신이고요. --117.53.77.84 (talk) 12:22, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your template changes

Changing a template should not be done without discussing with people. That template is used in over 100 articles. You added two names. At least Hideki Tojo mentions 'fascist'. The article for Park Chung-hee does not mention 'fascism' at all. So it looks like your opinion?

Perhaps you should ask first and discuss? I'm not sure where, though perhaps Portal talk:Fascism or Talk:Fascism? Shenme (talk) 07:59, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Unified Progressive Party. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. How many times do I have to tell you? We do not link to foreign Wiki articles unless there is literally no appropriate enwiki link - and the enwiki link is perfectly valid. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 00:47, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Petro Poroshenko Bloc, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 06:17, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Please provide edit summaries when you remove/add content. It helps me know your reason for your updates and I do not have to guesss why you did. Thanks! ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 14:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United Progressive Alliance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Centre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Center. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to United Russia, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:58, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Democratic Party of Japan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Centre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Opposition Bloc and Petro Poroshenko Bloc, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 09:58, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Please remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedic source. If you want to add a party's political position to the infobox, please don't just make it up. It must be backed up by third party, reliable sources. Thank you for bearing that it mind. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 10:03, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MissPiggysBoyfriend (talk) 05:12, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for repeated inclusion of unsourced content regarding political parties.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You've been warned and told repeatedly to provide sources if you are going to change the political position of parties like you are doing here. The burden for providing sources is on you to justify your edits. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:02, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MissPiggysBoyfriend (talk) 23:48, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. I noticed that you recently removed some content from People Power (Hong Kong) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:11, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated and continued inclusion of unsourced political positions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

.

While you added some sources, the repeated inclusion without sources is enough. You've been warned enough. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]