User talk:Byroncaroline

This user is a student editor in Washington_University_in_St._Louis/Gender_and_Politics_in_Global_Perspective_(Spring_2023) .

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Byroncaroline, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Editing Wikipedia, a guide for student editors Choosing an article to edit Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 00:46, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

I think this article is good; however, you need to establish some points where you cut too much information out. Also some of the sections were hard to follow and read. I think you have all the information in the article, all the content is good and well referenced. This also helps you out with this being a controversial topic since you’re providing evidence for each claim. I would say that your evidence is the strongest part of this article, just be careful when using these references to maintain a neutral tone. I think this article could be improved by using more neutral language, sometimes it felt a bit like an essay for class rather than an encyclopedia. Overall, this article is good and such an important topic to talk about. I commend you for tackling this article since it is not an easy topic and there is a lot of controversy surrounding it. It just needs more editing on the language and tone aspect of it, but the content is incredibly well supported. I see that there are no images on the page, but all the tables add to the visual language and they help split up all the text into more digestible pieces. Danimo2021 (talk) 18:13, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article is very comprehensive and does a good job of trying to include as many viewpoints without being biased toward any. The sandbox draft does a good job of filling in gaps of knowledge that were not there in the original article. The addition of current U.S. abortion laws to the “National laws” section develops the section very well. Maybe adding a subsection heading “United States” will help to organize the section more as more information about other countries’ laws are added in the future. The improvement that would be the most helpful is adding more citations overall, but seeing as this is just a draft, I’m sure this issue will resolve itself naturally as the project develops over time (Angel.e.sosa (talk) 19:17, 3 April 2023 (UTC))[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Bexaendos. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Abortion law have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Bexaendos (talk) 11:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]