User talk:C. Jeremy Wong

Welcome!'

Hello, C. Jeremy Wong, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for LibreOffice. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Steven Walling 04:16, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello Steven,

Thank you very much for your companionable 'reception', ... ... I'm much obliged!

By the way, on the 'LibreOffice' page, I have to admit that I'm not very familiar with the subject. Yet, I do hope that the readers of the page can grasp, through 1-2 sentences, the relation between the 2 document formats--Open Document Format and the OpenOffice.org XML format.

Since, in Microsoft Office, the newer file formats are called the Office Open XML format and the Microsoft Office XML formats; users of MS Office may be confused about, by the term 'XML', when they start using LibreOffice--It's probable, for some of them, to suppose that OOo XML is newer than ODF ... ....

This was the major reason why I added the sentences, 'OpenDocument Format (which is the default format for OOo v3.x & v2.x)' and 'OpenOffice.org XML (which is the default format for OOo v1.x)', onto the LibreOffice page.

I trust you have a better ground considering my 2 sentences 'unsatisfactory', but I still hope that you can comprehend my motivation ... .... Would you please kindly offer me some directions on how to improve my wordings on that page? Thanks in advance!

C. Jeremy Wong (talk) 12:42, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi Jeremy, per your talk page comment, I've changed the redirect at "General Instruments" to point to the disambiguation page instead of the main general instrument article. I've also added a hatnote to General Instrument pointing to the dab page, which is standard. As for LibreOffice... I didn't actually revert your changes, another Wikipedian did, as you can see in the history tab of the page. I would suggest describing why you wanted to make the changes you did on Talk:LibreOffice. Best of luck, Steven Walling 04:33, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of OpenMobile World Wide Inc.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on OpenMobile World Wide Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 09:05, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi, Jeremy. After considering your comments on the talk page, I have deleted OpenMobile World Wide Inc., as nominated. I have however updated your user-space version of the articles, and there should be no issue about re-creating it if the notability of the company can at least be stated, preferably established with supporting cites. A search [1] showed no significant coverage of the article's name as written outside self-published, social networks and Wikipedia plus mirrors. Rich Farmbrough, 14:35, 23 September 2011 (UTC).

Talkback

Hello, C. Jeremy Wong. You have new messages at Muhandes's talk page.
Message added 09:31, 26 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Muhandes (talk) 09:31, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Open Mobile (disambiguation)

I cleaned up Open Mobile (disambiguation) per WP:DAB and MOS:DAB. You may want to consult these guidelines before creating another disambiguation page. Best regards and happy editing.--Muhandes (talk) 09:46, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Time-Division Long-Term Evolution

I corrected the {{in-use}} on that article. As the template text says, please be sure to remove it or replace it with {{Underconstruction}} between editing sessions. I'm at your service if you need any assistance, or have any questions on policy and guidelines. --Muhandes (talk) 10:13, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

I removed the {{in-use}}, which should only be used, as the text of the template says, for a singular session. Feel free to put it back when you want to start an editing session. --Muhandes (talk) 09:19, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Dear Muhandes,

Although I want so much to continue keep quiet, not to argue with anyone, but to work on something that are more probably be contrivutive for the vast majority of 'quiet' Wikipedia readers; I've found I'm compelled to reveal the fact that:

In the a few days prior to my last writing on the article (TD-LTE), I had continually written on it and the other articles. I have collected a lot of materials for further writing--yet, unfortunately, I have been so much distracted by anorther person!

Today, I still can only write a very little on the article, because I have to first write on why the 12-13 changes made by another person onto the article are almost all unnecessary/inappropriate/meaningless (deletion of valuable information, change of the original words only to synonyms, etc.) ... ...!

It is obvious enough that more articles are needed to be added to Wikipedia, I don't understand why they should not be paid much more attention to! The TD-LTE technology has been being developed for over 3 years, it's an 'old' topic; there should not be such an urgency that the article has to be monitored so closely and so frequently! I hope that, much more articles can be added to Wikipedia--rather than much more arguments ... ....

C. Jeremy Wong (talk)

As I repeatedly say, if you want to work in quiet, work in your own userspace, that's why we have user spaces. There is no escaping it, articles on the main space will be edited by other editors. I'm sorry that you did not like my edits. Unfortunately, you do not own the article, and all of the edits were things that were a must based on Wikipedia policies. I will repeat again (since from some reason you refuse to listen) what you need to do to not get interrupted. If you don't want anyone to interrupt you during an editing session, add {{in-use}} to the top of the article. Do not add it with "tl|" or anything else. If you don't want editors to interrupt you at all do it on your own user space. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 17:43, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Another note. A list of devices with part numbers is surely something Wikipedia should not have. Especially, as you provide zero sources. I will not remove it while you are still busy on the article, but the entire section should be replaced with a prose section discussing, in general, the availability of equipment, rather than the specific models. --Muhandes (talk) 17:51, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Those Wikipedia readers, who have interest about the details of the equipments/devices/components, can easily check from the companies' websites and see whether the sorted-out information is true or false. The 'source' of the sorted-out information is already clear enough! There are a number of Wikipedia pages providing information about products (with model numbers), e.g. List of telephone switches & List of future Intel microprocessors. Most readers should have found them very informative & helpful--Isn't it ought to be what the readers want, as well as being what the donators to the Wikimedia Foundation expect ... .... C. Jeremy Wong (talk)

It may be OK to have them on "List of X equipment", but but it is not OK to have them on this article. The fact that other wrong articles exist is not an argument anyway. Being "informative & helpful" is not a reason for including something. A list of the phone numbers of all US congressman is very informative and extremely useful, yet you wont find it here. Wikipedia is not a catalog of existing models, nor is it a guidebook. Subjects should be treated encyclopedically, summarizing reliable sources. The entire section should be replaced with a prose section discussing, in general, the availability of equipment, rather than the specific models. It can say something like "Datang has announced it will release a ePC + e-UTRAN model, while Nokia and Huawei will be releasing routers" (don't catch me on the accuracy of facts, I'm just giving examples). Readers who are interested in the exact models can follow the sources to the companies' websites.

As for sources, the fact that they exist out there is meaningless, you need to supply the sources for verification. I know this may seem awkward, but this is how Wikipedia works, everything must have a source.

I am not trying to discourage you, but this is how Wikipedia works. There are guidelines, policies, and common practice. By refusing to follow them you will just get the material removed, which will be a shame. --Muhandes (talk) 08:36, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

I will deal with the 'Equipment availability' section later, but at the moment I have to write the 'Technical highlights' & 'History' sections first (since there are only a few sentences there). C. Jeremy Wong (talk)

I have no problem with that. I'm only making this suggestion so you wont waste too much time on something which is more than likely to be removed in the end. --Muhandes (talk) 19:57, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Follow guidelines

• When an article is on mainspace every editor can edit the article,you must follow the policies and guidelines of wikipedia,rather than sending unnecessary messages.Ehsan Sehgal (talk) 12:41, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
• Sorry,I did not see,go ahead.Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ehsan Sehgal (talk • contribs) 12:47, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:44, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your reminding! But I did have clicked the 'C. Jeremy Wong (talk)' (as you can see from my earlier talks), may be something wrong has happened during the transmission. Anyway, Thks! C. Jeremy Wong (talk)

Look like you are confused

Hi,C.Jeremy Wong,it seems to me that you are very confused with your own edits,I did not change any text in the article except (two/three days ago),sections title names,which I thought,were suitable,rather than a title with ful text.I check "view history",you are your own busy to edit your text,I see nobody else.Cheers.Ehsan Sehgal (talk) 10:12, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

May I add that there is a serious ownership problem here. If Ehsan Sehgal feels an edit is appropriate he is entitled to do it. As I said before (seven times already? I stopped counting) if you don't want other editors to edit your work, don't put it on the mainspace. --Muhandes (talk) 10:37, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

• Hi,Muhandes,let us drink tea,give him time,I realy don't know what he is doing with his article,I only see he is taging (In-use) every day hours and hours and doing nothing.And sending me messages to stop editing.I enjoy that kind of editors.Cheers.Ehsan Sehgal (talk) 11:28, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

• • Hi,C.Jeremy Wong,I can see you are master of your field and language?,but why you are behaving as like you are here all in all,tell me and give me reasons that why you change my edits every time while that were very suitable?.Technical highlights is very suitable section title because you have mentioned bellow charter of technicle things.I check "view history",there are only you and you,what is the problem with you,you are creating article,or your ownership?.What is behind in the curtain?.Please act an editor keeping in mind policies and guidelines of wikipedia.Thanks.Ehsan Sehgal (talk) 12:00, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Dear Mr Sehgal,
I'm sorry that there is a misunderstanding!
1. The heading '==Technical highlights==' has already been assigned to the (future) paragraphs begins with the paragraph 'TD-LTE offers asymmetric use of unpaired spectrum.' As for your changing of this section's heading to '==Networks==', it is deemed unsuitable because you can read from the second sentence, 'In the spectrum allocated to mobile-communications networks, the application of TDD separates outward and return signals, ... ...' -- TDD (Time-Division Duplexing) is about signal processing on the 'physical layer' ... ....
2. For the section beginning with the sentence 'As end-to-end solutions, there are already a wide range of TD-LTE/3G multi-mode Mobile-Infrastructure Equipments (MIEs), Customer-Premises Equipments (CPEs), ... ...', it is a division grazing around the readiness of the equipments & solutions, hence '==Equipment/Component Availability=='. Although it cites a number of 'technology products', the focus has been placed only on their TD-LTE connectivity, their availability & application ... .... You may read from the sentences, 'The multi-mode solutions are going to empower 3-G operators ... ...' and 'For end-users, TD-LTE/3G multi-mode services will enable ... ...' ... ....
May I further explain the issue to you a few days later? Thank you!
C. Jeremy Wong (talk)

It's been a week

It's been a week now since you edited Time-Division Long-Term Evolution. Are you done? --Muhandes (talk) 12:00, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

And now, are you done? This have taken long enough, if I don't hear from you in a day or two I am going to start correcting the article from the numerous violations of the Manual of Style and other policies and guidelines. --Muhandes (talk) 19:29, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Two weeks is long enough. I rewrote the article according to policy and guidelines. If you have any comments or suggestions, I suggest you make them on the talk page. --Muhandes (talk) 18:55, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:C. Jeremy Wong/OpenMobile World Wide

A tag has been placed on User:C. Jeremy Wong/OpenMobile World Wide requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 10:30, 9 March 2019 (UTC)