User talk:C46943
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
{{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!
Jarkeld (talk) 00:09, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Alan Johnson[edit]
I noticed that you eventually found the transaction that sent Alan Johnson to AAA, but for future reference, MLB.com's transactions page, Rotoworld and CBS Sports' transactions pages, are usually great places for up-to-date information. Cheers,--Giants27(T|C) 15:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Template:Footballbox1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. WOSlinker (talk) 11:41, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
The use of non-free content in the way you are attempting is not supported by WP:NFCC policy or WP:NFC guideline for a number of reasons. First, there's WP:NFCC #10c which requires a separate specific fair use rationale for each use of an item. There is no rationale, for example, at on File:FCB.svg for the uses on this article. It would require five separate rationales because this article in your desired version has five uses of this image. But, that isn't going to work either. Reusing the image five times is a blatant failure of WP:NFCC #8, #3a, and #1. #8 because having to redisplay the image five times isn't significant and removing them doesn't impair the reader's understanding of the article. #3a because the use of so many non-free images is not supported. #1 because the images can be replaced with text in this usage, and have been with the club name and a link to FC Barcelona. Further, the use of non-free images in this way fails WP:NFTABLE, part of the WP:NFC guideline. That these images are used on other wikis is completely irrelevant. Their policies and guidelines carry no weight here. Please do not undertake to restore these images to this article again, or to use images in a similar manner on any other article. If you have questions, ask. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 13:49, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Goals2[edit]
Hi, I've reverted your edits to template:footballbox collapsbile on the FC Barcelona season page. Unfortunately Made format the same as previous seasons is not a valid reason for your edits as the formatting did not adhere to the documentation of the template in previous seasons. Note the usage example for goals2. Let's do this correctly this season. Vanadus (talk) 21:16, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Footballbox1, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:04, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission Footballbox1[edit]
Hello C46943. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Footballbox1.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Footballbox1}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 19:24, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, C46943. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)