User talk:CLinden

Welcome!

Hello, CLinden, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Absentis 12:31, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Linden.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Linden.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:08, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you agree to release this image under a free license such as GFDL, which would permit re-use for any purpose (including commerical purposes), then we cannot use it on Wikipedia. To release the image copyright as GFDL, please put {{GFDL}} on the image description page. If you release the image as GFDL, you of course retain personality rights, and may also wish to add {{personality rights}} to the image description page. Please copy text as you see it when reading the page, not as seen in the edit window. Thank you. --Deskana (talk) 21:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted Image:Linden.jpg as it is now redundant to Image:Charles Linden.jpg. I also added {{personality rights}} to the page. Thank you for your image. --Deskana (talk) 09:42, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Remarks

You really need to stop accusing me of maleficence. Please comment on my edits, and not on me. Your comments on the Charles Linden talk page border on harrasment.

Start being civil, or I will do my best to get you banned. Have a nice day. Absentis 14:36, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hmm :) Somebody vanished Elmao 10:24, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Charles Linden, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Jauerback 20:51, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Colliver55 (talk) 23:01, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is no 'conflict of interests'. The material being posted is wrong. It is not factual. It contains malice and is not a valid Linden Method review. Wikipedia is not a forum for malice but for truth... whoever heard of an encyclopedia of untruths. This is where Wikipedia falls over.

Email

Thank you for the email, Mr. Linden. I took a look, and the current version it seems, has been nominated for deletion again. As this is what you had originally requested last year, I think perhaps the best thing is that it be deleted. Unfortunately, due to a lack of media sources that are not press releases, or associated with the Centre or Method, it really does not meet the notability requirements for Wikipedia. And, you would no longer have to worry about this or deal with it, so it is probably for the best, so far all those who have offered opinions on the deletion discussion are of the mind that it should be deleted. I'm sorry you've had this trouble, but hopefully this will solve many issues for you. Good to hear from you again, and I hope you are well. Cheers, Ariel♥Gold 21:51, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's weird that people want it deleted now even though the main references are from a large newspaper and from me personally, the 'horses mouth'. I like the page and people respond well to it, but the problem is that it provides competitors and malicious people the opportunity to be disrespectful. It is such a pity that it will be deleted, if only people would use fact instead of creating facst to suit their own agendas. Charles.

Improper removal of the AfD tag

Please do not remove an AfD tag for articles where the AfD discussion is still open, as you did here[1]. The AfD tag may only be removed by the closing admin once the AfD discussion is formally closed. See Wikipedia:Guide to deletion for details about how the deletion process works. It is OK to edit the article while the article is discussed in an AfD but the AfD tag itself must not be removed. You are also welcome to express your opinion in the relevant AfD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Linden (2nd nomination). Thank you, Nsk92 (talk) 10:07, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Charles Linden.jpg

The file File:Charles Linden.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:06, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]