User talk:Cabanes
Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Cabanes! My name is Ryan, aka Acetic Acid. I noticed that you were new and haven't received any messages yet. I just wanted to see how you were doing. Wikipedia can be a little intimidating at first, since it uses different formatting than other sites that use HTML and CSS. In the long run, though, you'll find that the WikiSyntax is a lot easier and faster than those other ways. Here are a few links to get you started:
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
There are a lot of policies and guides to read, but I highly recommend reading over those first. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Please be sure to sign your name on Talk Pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, along with a link to your user page. This way, others know when you left a message and how to find you. It's easier than having to type out your name, right? :)
I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. We can use all the help we can get! Have a nice day. Sincerely, Ryan 07:41, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
- I think that because you own the painting and took the picture, you should be okay. I'll double check. Ryan 08:10, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
I agree. I don't see any problem with using the image. -- Essjay · Talk 08:27, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
- No problem. Good night and God Bless! Acetic Acid 01:33, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
Personal Prelatures & Their Establishment
[edit]Thanks for your reply. I think including a link to the canon which establishes Personal Prelatures helpful in explaining what they are and how they are erected, and therefore, how Opus Dei is situated ("fits") into the whole Church. Clicking on the link for Personal Prelature in the 2nd sentence doesn't yield much new information. Also, the establishment of Opus Dei as a Personal Prelature did take place on 28 November 1982 and was effected by JP II's signing of the Apostolic Constituion Ut Sit. I.e., the signing of this document on that date was the pivotal event in the Prelature's establishment. Isn't this and a link to the document useful information to someone reading the opening paragraph? Would it be better to place my suggestions on the discussion page for a while and wait?
Best,
MrsPam 15:16, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Josemaria Escriva painting
[edit]Hello, Since you own copyright of the picture entitled 'Magpakabanal sa Gawain' of Josemaria Escriva, I am writing to ask whether you would be prepared to allow permission for its use in a book on Opus Dei, due to go to press in Spring 2007. I await your response - but please note that the schedule is very tight! All good wishes username:pcaaveiro 29 June 2006 ˆˆˆˆ
Hi Cabanes,
on Commons only now we found that the photo of the painting uploaded by you some years ago, carries a PD-template, though as of your own words, you released it under GFDL. Could you solve this contradiction? I would recommend you to change the license either to GFDL or to re-upload it under a CC-BY-SA license, in order to allow at least a minimum of control over the image, which would not be the case with a PD image. --Túrelio (talk) 22:07, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi Cabanes, have you seen this DR? --Túrelio (talk) 12:57, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Cabanes. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The file File:StjosemariaMagpakabanal sa gawainBe a saint thru work.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Redundant to File:StjosemariaMagpakabanal sa gawain.jpg
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HouseBlastertalk 01:46, 11 July 2023 (UTC)