Jump to content

User talk:Cactusisme

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

How/When can I be unblocked?[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cactusisme (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello admins, I was just checking when/if I would be unblocked; there was no time limit set on the block page. I have been reflecting for the past few weeks about the incident and realised the reason why I was blocked. I feel that I deserve this punishment for hurting others. If I am unblocked, I would try to make amends and try to improve Wikipedia instead of deteriorating it and hurting others. Meanwhile, as I am blocked, I would be reading through WP:Blocking_policy,WP:Contributing to Wikipedia,WP:FAQ/Editing and reading through Wikipedia policy and guidelines. If I am unblocked I will try to be a better person than I previously was. Thank you. Cactus0rme (talk) 02:09, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked indefinitely. There's no set expiry date. This unblock request doesn't address the reason for your block. Please review WP:GAB. Yamla (talk) 15:05, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why I cannot send the unblock request from User:Helloidonthaveaname[edit]

Since it was a long time since I had accessed the account, I had forgotten the password. Please try to understand my situation. Sorry for the inconvenience caused. Cactus0rme (talk) 02:32, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cactusisme (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It has been at 3 weeks since my block was started, and I have taken this time to understand more about the Wikipedia policies and community and what I did was wrong to it and reflect on my actions. I understand the decision made by the administrators and understand why they had decided on blocking me. It was for my own well-being and the well-being of others. I made several mistakes that I ask forgiveness for. I know my behaviour was wrong and promise not to repeat it. If I do get unblocked, I would first try doing the beginner task at my homepage and would try to get someone to mentor/adopt me. I would also try to get the article: Kartick Chandra Paul republished as it was deleted when I was blocked. But mainly I would be editing and sometimes, when I am ready, create some articles which are notable and good enough to be on Wikipedia. I have created a draft about Kartick Chandra Paul in Simple Wikipedia; https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kartick_Chandra_Paul. However I do not know how to use infoboxes in simple Wikipedia, thus did not create one but I have tried many time but fail; seaa history. Thank you for your time and I hope you are willing to approve my unblock request. CactusMunch Yum o.o 01:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) Good day to you Cactus0rme, I am not an administrator so I'm unable to review your request, however I'm simply giving my 2 cents, as per Yamla's comments, Wikipedia is a volunteer website, meaning no one is forced to or has to respond to your unblock request, you'll just need to be patient whilst an admin looks over your unblock request, check out the Guide to appealing blocks page to get a good idea of how to make a good request, that gives your request the best possible chance of succeeding should the reviewing administrator agree. Pinging admins also isn't the best idea, as it conflicts with the aforementioned volunteer statement above, give it some time and an admin will eventually get around to reviewing your request, just make sure you read through the relevant pages on how to make a good request. --AutisticAndrew 00:42, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay--CactusMunch Yum o.o 01:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cactusisme (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It has been at 3 weeks since my block was started, and I have taken this time to understand more about the Wikipedia policies and community and what I did was wrong to it and reflect on my actions. I understand the decision made by the administrators and understand why they had decided on blocking me. It was for my own well-being and the well-being of others. I made several mistakes that I ask forgiveness for. I know my behaviour was wrong and promise not to repeat it. If I do get unblocked, I would first try doing the beginner task at my homepage and would try to get someone to mentor/adopt me. I would also try to get the article: Kartick Chandra Paul republished as it was deleted when I was blocked. But mainly I would be editing and sometimes, when I am ready, create some articles which are notable and good enough to be on Wikipedia. I have created a draft about Kartick Chandra Paul in Simple Wikipedia; https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kartick_Chandra_Paul. However I do not know how to use infoboxes in simple Wikipedia, thus did not create one but I have tried many time but fail; seaa history. I will also only use this account now onwords and promise not to abuse using other accounts. Thank you for your time and I hope you are willing to approve my unblock request.

Decline reason:

Per Yamla's comment below: There have been far too many issues in far too little time for us to consider an unblock at this stage. Additionally, this request doesn't convince me that you fully understand what the issue with your conduct was. --Blablubbs (talk) 01:59, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 Confirmed sockpuppetry, matching jpgordon's findings above. There's no reasonable chance anyone will unblock you at this time. Your only real option is WP:SO which requires six months with zero edits. If you make no further edits (with this or any other account), that would mean waiting until at least 2024-12-21. You've been significantly abusive over your many accounts. --Yamla (talk) 10:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]