User talk:Caffeine USA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 22 2006[edit]

Please be careful not to remove disputed content from Wikipedia's Bob Brinker entry without a valid reason. Many others want that link on the page so you should try to convince them in the discussion your POV. Do not keep deleting their content. WikiHelperUSA 20:57, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the Wiki links that I refer to on that talk page.Caffeine USA 00:23, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November follow-up: Caffiene USA was very properly removing links WikiHelperUSA had added to the now blacklisted Suite101.com investment sites -- see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#Suite101 dot com. WikiHelperUSA has since been asked not to mis-use warnings and and add inappropriate links. --A. B. 22:01, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Don McDonald[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Don McDonald, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rtphokie (talk) 00:58, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: star trek[edit]

I reverted your edit because it was unsourced and not-notable. --HELLØ ŦHERE 23:31, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As JpGrB says, it's debatable on whether it is worth including. Please discuss on the talk page. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 00:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]