User talk:Cali Boy 09

December 2022

Hello, I'm Aishik Rehman. An edit you recently made to Lusail Stadium seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aishik Rehman (talk) 19:14, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm Bojo1498. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2022 FIFA World Cup, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. bojo | talk 17:11, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced edits

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which page(s) are you talking about? Cali Boy 09 (talk) 17:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Cr1TiKaL

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Cr1TiKaL, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:30, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Cr1TiKaL

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Cr1TiKaL, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited When the Saints Go Marching In (sports anthem), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Anthony High School. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Kelsey plum title celebration.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Kelsey plum title celebration.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:57, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Something being posted on someone's social media account doesn't make it Wikipedia:Public domain as explained in c:Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Internet images; "pubic domain" in a copyright law sense refers to some thin that is either no longer or never eligible for copyright protection, or has been declared to be as such by its copyright holder; it doesn't mean freely viewable online or otherwise publicly available. The only person who can release this photo into the public domain is its copyright holder, and the copyright holder of a photo is typically the person who takes it. So, unless you've taken this photo yourself, you can't "release" it public domain, and you're going to need to show that the person who did take the photo has released under a {{CC0}} license. If the social media account you found the image on clearly states that the image has been released under a "CC0" license and that the account belongs to the copyright holder of the photo, please provide a link to it so that the file's licensing can be verified. Otherwise, the file is going to need to be treated as non-free content and comply with Wikipedia's non-free content use policy. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:13, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]