Jump to content

User talk:Callmejackie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Koodathayi Murders (October 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 04:18, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Callmejackie! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 04:18, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Koodathayi Murders (October 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. SITH (talk) 13:39, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clarify

[edit]

Hi there, re: these edits, while I don't ultimately disagree with the removal of this content, I disagree with your rationale. Whatever law you were referring to in your edit summary to justify the removal is not relevant to Wikipedia, as Wikipedia is not an Indian company and the encyclopedia is not subject to the laws of other nations, which may include laws that censor content. On the subject of censorship, generally speaking, Wikipedia is not censored. This matter is slightly different, though. While some media outlets have mentioned the victim's name, others have not, and that gave me pause about whether the content should be included. An editor with more experience editing contentious biographies of living people advised me that since the actor doesn't seem to have made a public statement about it, it was probably best to omit the content on that basis for the time being. Since you are a new editor, I wanted to bring you some info on how Wikipedia works. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]