User talk:CambridgeLibrarian

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, CambridgeLibrarian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Chevy monte carlo 15:49, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and welcome to de:wiki

Please kindly have a look at your talkpage on German wiki here: I changed "Universitätsbibliothek Cambridge" to "Cambridge University Library". My nick is in de:wiki Emeritus. Greetings, Emeritus --178.26.40.137 (talk) 10:44, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Emeritus, That's fine. I didn't know how much we need to change the names of such libraries, e.g. translated or not translated. :-)

Best, CambridgeLibrarian CambridgeLibrarian (talk) 21:05, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Changes of library names in de:wiki

Hi, if you agree, I like to change Schottische Nationalbibliothek to new main entry: "National Library of Scotland" - there is no reason to use German name (few hits, sources like general library histories use NLS). At this occasion I will also create a Kategorie:Handschrift der National Library of Scotland Edinburgh according to en:wiki Category:Manuscripts in the National Library of Scotland.

2nd: the same will happen to "Irische Nationalbibliothek" -> "National Library of Ireland"; and 3rd: "Nationalbibliothek von Wales" -> "National Library of Wales". - Btw: I use this en account very seldom, because someone has "stolen" my nick, and Emeritus_s does not belong to my Global Account in wp. - Regards, --Emeritus s (talk) 02:38, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Emeritus_s / Emeritus,

That's fine. CambridgeLibrarian (talk) 06:50, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heythrop Library (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by VersaceSpace was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:GNG and WP:NBUILDING, you're going to need to find at least two third-party reliable sources that speak of this library in depth.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Heythrop Library and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Heythrop Library, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--VersaceSpace 🌃 18:39, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CambridgeLibrarian! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --VersaceSpace 🌃 18:39, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: German National Prize (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No references and their website is not a reliable source. Please see this guide for adding citations along with the notablitity guideline. You may also find Your first article helpful.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:German National Prize and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:German National Prize, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:08, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heythrop Library (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RPSkokie was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Heythrop Library and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Heythrop Library, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 08:53, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heythrop Library has been accepted

Heythrop Library, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 19:15, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! I will try to improve this article/entry further!

@ CambridgeLibrarian (talk) 20:59, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:German National Prize

Hello, CambridgeLibrarian. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:German National Prize, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:German National Prize

Hello, CambridgeLibrarian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "German National Prize".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:42, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]