Jump to content

User talk:Can Not

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I became tired of these non-notable ancient comments.

Placing stuff like this on the article is not appropriate, even if it is Fred Phelps. —Random832 06:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. I just thought someone on the Fred Phelps page might have actually been wanting to read about vaginal cleaning. --Can Not (talk) 05:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your Edits to Project Chanology

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Project Chanology , did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BJTalk 00:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Anonymous (group). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 07:17, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your removal of cited material [1], [2], The Northern Light appears to be a valid source, which is cited appropriately. You may wish to read WP:RS and WP:V, and also discuss your removal of cited material on the article's talk page, please. Cirt (talk) 22:58, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please respond to the valid comments by Ayla (talk · contribs) and by Ned Scott (talk · contribs), at Talk:Anonymous_(group)#List_of_False_and_Misleading_Information. Cirt (talk) 23:01, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User Page Redirection

[edit]

Redirecting your user page to an article is disruptive. Your user page is linked in article histories, etc. It is confusing to people to click on a user name and end up at an article. As you continue to redirect your page, I have protected it. If you ever decide that you want to change the contents, let me know and I'll unprotect it as long as you don't redirect it again. -- JLaTondre (talk) 22:03, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]