Jump to content

User talk:Cancina5645

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Cancina5645! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm HitroMilanese. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Neptune, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hitro talk 19:32, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hundred days offensive

[edit]

I undid your edit on account of there being no citation. If you have a source please include it.Labattblueboy (talk) 06:02, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Temperatures in Celsius

[edit]

I'd like to make you aware of two things about your edits like this one: 1) despite the fact that 0 °C equals 273.15 K, the precision associated with writing ".15" there is unwarranted (the Celsius figure has to have the same number of significant figures as the Kelvin figure; 2) a minus sign is properly a distinct symbol (−), not a hyphen (-). I hope this informs you. --JorisvS (talk) 20:00, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

President of Syria

[edit]

Hello, Canciana5645 and welcome to Wikipedia! I've reverted your edits to President of Syria because I felt they may not meet Wikipedia's criteria or standards for neutrality, "original research" and verifiability. If you need additional assistance with editing, please see the Wikipedia:Tutorial. Dsprc (talk) 23:11, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Iraqi insurgency (post-U.S. withdrawal) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • of [[Mosul]] and major areas in [[northern Iraq]] by the [[Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant]] (ISIS. The United States has asked for a change of Prime Minister, saying that that would alleviate

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:55, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hezbollah foreign relations may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • group is also suggested to have operations outside the Middle East in places such as Latin America.<ref name="<ref name="Security" /><ref>[http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1011868.html Ha'aretz]
  • supports the peaceful restructuring of Israel, and reconcilation with the Palestinian territories. (i.e [[West Bank]] and [[Gaza]]. Neither Hezbollah or [[Hamas]] should be a part of the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:53, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2015 State of the Union Address has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:CRYSTAL. While, there will almost certainly be a SOTU address in 2015, and Obama will almost certainly be the one to give it (knock wood), everything else is guesswork. After you cut the fabricated list of topics, the only thing left is the probably correct statement that Obama will deliver the speech; way too early to produce this article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TJRC (talk) 21:43, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1791 State of the Union Address, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.everything2.com/title/George+Washington%2527s+1791+State+of+the+Union+Address.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:59, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adding templates

[edit]

Hi Cancina5645, I just wanted to let you know that you don't have to write out all the text for a template to add it to articles. Just list the template, and it will appear in article just as it would when writing it out. Cmr08 (talk) 00:45, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1920 State of the Union Address, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.thisnation.com/library/sotu/1920ww.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:20, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1930 State of the Union Address, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.infoplease.com/t/hist/state-of-the-union/142.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:12, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Response

[edit]

There is no other proper way to create State of the Union Address articles. I have already used the same text for many articles. There is not copyright issue, and I have done the right thing by creating these pages. Cancina5645 (talk) 14:17, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1934 State of the Union Address, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://stateoftheunion.onetwothree.net/texts/19340103.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:30, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1860 State of the Union Address, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/1860-state-of-the-union-address/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:58, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1859 State of the Union Address, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.presidentialrhetoric.com/historicspeeches/buchanan/stateoftheunion1859.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:20, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1970 State of the Union Address, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.infoplease.com/t/hist/state-of-the-union/183.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:19, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1974 State of the Union Address, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://historicaldocuments.org/1974-state-of-the-union-address/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:01, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1800 State of the Union Address, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.literaturepage.com/read/john-adams-state-of-union-17.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:11, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1801 State of the Union Address, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.thisnation.com/library/sotu/1801tj.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:31, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1802 State of the Union Address, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.thisnation.com/library/sotu/1802tj.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1865 State of the Union Address, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://historicaldocuments.org/andrew-johnson-1865-state-of-the-union-address/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:18, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1945 State of the Union Address, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://engforum.pravda.ru/index.php?/topic/252931-roosevelt-state-of-the-union-speach-1945/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:49, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1875 State of the Union Address, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.thisnation.com/library/sotu/1875ug.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:04, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 1836 State of the Union Address

[edit]

Hi, I'm Scope creep. Cancina5645, thanks for creating 1836 State of the Union Address!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add categories to these State of the Union Address.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. scope_creep 15:57, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Might be worth adding specific detail about a specific speech. Being from Scotland, I know that some of these speeches have/had tremendous far reaching consequences. The encyclopedic knowledge is of a deeper quality as well. If I was doing it, I would one, with some rich ideas/??, two perfect it, and three, template it, and span out. scope_creep talk 17:36 25 July 2014 (UTC)

My goal is not to create a perfect article.. Cancina5645 (talk) 16:58, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1939 State of the Union Address, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://news.rapgenius.com/Franklin-delano-roosevelt-state-of-the-union-address-1939-annotated.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:00, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1799 State of the Union Address, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://historicaldocuments.org/john-adams-1799-state-of-the-union-address/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:06, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1837 State of the Union Address
added a link pointing to Confederacy
1927 State of the Union Address
added a link pointing to Dikes

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1856 State of the Union Address, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.presidentialrhetoric.com/historicspeeches/pierce/stateoftheunion1856.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:10, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1825 State of the Union Address, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.presidentialrhetoric.com/historicspeeches/adams_jq/stateoftheunion.1825.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:40, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 1966 State of the Union Address, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.thisnation.com/library/sotu/1966lj.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:28, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Discovery of serotonin

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Discovery of serotonin. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Serotonin. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Serotonin – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. The Original Bob (talk) 15:42, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1805 State of the Union Address
added a link pointing to Republican
Diazepam
added a link pointing to Depression

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Belligerents of the Syrian Civil War for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Belligerents of the Syrian Civil War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belligerents of the Syrian Civil War until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 09:23, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Katie Davis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Electric Wombat (talk) 15:39, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Seventh President iof Iraq.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 03:52, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Gospel of Matthew, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 19:03, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 American Intervention in Syria may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • In 2013, after an alleged chemical attack by the Assad Regime on its own people (the [[Ghouta chemical attack]], U.S president [[Barack Obama]] announced that Syria had crossed a "

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:57, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to 2015 State of the Union Address, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 23:21, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to George Frideric Handel may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • German is pronounced.</ref> {{birth date|1685|03|05|df=yes}}) – {{death date|1759|04|14|df=yes }}) was a German-born, British [[Baroque music|Baroque]] composer famous for his [[baroque opera|opera]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:57, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2015 State of the Union Address

[edit]

The article 2015 State of the Union Address has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems premature; seems to only consist of speculation given no sources listed

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 331dot (talk) 23:22, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please do not edit another editor's commentary as you did here. TJRC (talk) 01:33, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 01:43, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Handel's birthday

[edit]

Please note that following has been posted on the article's "Talk" page

Well, after "Antandrus", "Hegvald", and "GraemeLeggett", and now me who agrees with them, we have a consensus of four editors who agree with the interpretation of 23 February per The Grove Dictionary of Opera, the standard reference work on opera. I have added that reference to the article.
User talk: Carcana5645 needs to be aware of the THREE REVERT RULE if he/she reverts again today, since his/her revert edits have been made at 8:47, 12:17, and 13:10 on 22 November 2014. Viva-Verdi (talk) 22:23, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
See Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule.

Passion oratorio

[edit]

Thanks for the attempt to cover this topic, but before it can be linked it needs to be improved with better sources. We have "Passions (Bach)" and Passion (music), - the new one needs to be very good to be needed at all. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:05, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Johann Sebastian Bach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 State of the Union Address, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page War in Afghanistan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antonio Vivaldi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Classical. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]