User talk:Canislupis0

--

Reasons to use this page

- You don't like my edits - Want to discuss possible changes to an article I've made

Claims of stalking you

You claimed I am stalking you. Since you only just started editing today, it's a rather hard case to make that I am somehow stalking you. There's nothing for me to follow you around about, since you haven't been anywhere on the project except for two places outside of your userspace.

While we're talking; perhaps you'd care to explain how you created your account and just four minutes later found yourself wanting to advocate keeping an article? --Hammersoft (talk) 19:09, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi. I've used Wikipedia under a public library IP for over 7 years so I understand how it works. I've had an account before but haven't edited for a while and wanted to make an account to try and have a go and prove that editors are mostly wrong and the system is flawed. I thought to make a change. Also, the claim of four minutes is funny as it's pure coincidence - believe it ir not. Once again, I have realised Wikipedia is a fools game. But then again you're an "editor" (somehow) and you probably get paid by Wiki from the dirty money bag that they have collected over the years by lying and deceiving their readers on the costs of servers and offices. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Canislupis0 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

• • (copied from my talk page; we can keep conversation together here) Nobody gets paid by Wikipedia to edit here. --Hammersoft (talk) 19:22, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
    • I do understand, but at times it seems like certain people are more influenced by the "strict" guidelines of Wikipedia and try to be as negative rather than helpful, something you would expect more from a corporate run Wiki rather than one that anyone can edit. This site needs dire improvement and people need to be more helpful and adjust guidelines more. For example, a professional soccer player can play in a low division 'professional' game and have a Wikipedia page, but not a business person who has run a family business for fourty years with great success. The guidelines need changing and I know it's not your fault but comments like that on the talk page you made seem like you are just pushing for one agenda rather than keeping it balanced. Yes, I've had the account for one day -- but I've been on Wikipedia for a long time.
      • I'm not pushing an agenda. The reality is that plenty of people try to create sockpuppet accounts in an attempt to tilt deletion discussions, thinking they are a vote when in fact they are not. I was simply posting on the AfD to assist the closer understand the nature of the accounts that were brand new and posting to the AfD. I'm sure you can appreciate the difficulties we'd have if it were a vote, and we didn't recognize sockpuppet accounts. People would be in a race to see how many tens, hundreds, even thousands of sockpuppet accounts they could create, and the project would suffer for it. If you want to change how Wikipedia works, making comments at an AfD isn't the way forward. I recommend you make a posting at WP:VPP with your recommendations for how the project can be improved. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:47, 16 November 2018 (UTC)