User talk:Cannon212
That is not how the system works here: we don't publish bad articles, and then delete them – we work on bad articles until they get to the point in which they pass our requirements for publishing. Draft:Mitchell Hope is simply not a worthy subject for a Wikipedia article at this time – that may change in a year or two. But that's where we are right now. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:55, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- --IJBall That would be my point. In your opinion, it may be a bad article. As the author's instructor, I noticed she has not been given the opportunity to explain why she believes the article's subject to be notable. You continue to state that he is not notable, but give no reasoning. If you would like to be explain, I would be more than happy to listen so that I may obtain a complete understanding.Cannon212 (talk) 19:58, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
- Oh, no, I have explained. On multiple occasions. However, the original author blanked their Talk page, rather than listen to the advice. And multiple reviewers have tried to explain what's wrong with that article as well. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:04, 19 December 2016 (UTC)