User talk:CaptainIndia210

Hello, this is my talk page. I'm the most polite editor you will ever see.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhupesh Bansal (June 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bhupesh Bansal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bhupesh Bansal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil 665 07:17, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CaptainIndia210! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nearlyevil 665 07:17, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm new to Wikipedia but I did read the Guidelines. I request you, and want to learn more so I can improve the article and that it sails through. m emael: justssr210 (at the rate) gmail (dot) com

I hope I see you. Bhupesh210 (talk) 07:22, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello nearlyevil665, I added independent News links, links to the books he has written, if I add more news links do you see it being "eligible". Help me out here, I would do you a good service for your help and time. CaptainIndia210 (talk) 07:37, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user and Tonystark210 seem to be the same person. – Athaenara ✉ 02:19, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CaptainIndia210, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Iamfarzan (talk) 01:52, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bhupesh210 (talk · contribs) should probably be added to that. – Athaenara ✉ 08:25, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

– Athaenara ✉ 08:21, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]