User talk:Captainmagic

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Doctor Who, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. --GreenJoe 00:19, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Super-Hip edits

I appreciate your efforts to edit the [[Super-Hip], but so far you've just padded the article without adding any information of interest. Please feel free to add information that is verifiable and accurate, but don't edit just to add wordage. That does not improve the article; rather, it makes it worse. Thanks. Konczewski (talk) 01:23, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Either you're not reading your talk page, or you just want to start an edit war. Please do not keep reverting my edits unless you have a good reason. Thanks. Konczewski (talk) 01:56, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blackfly

Character names are not bolded in a TV show's article; the only thing that gets bolded is the first (and only the first) appearance of the name of the TV series itself. If the characters were being presented in a list format instead, it would be appropriate and permissible to bold their names — but not if you're going to leave it as a paragraph of prose. Bearcat (talk) 02:41, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Heap

Please: You cannot continue to add POV about the Hulk and Rick Jones at Heap (comics). That is your opinion. You say in an edit summary that "Stan Lee has said it was an influence." That's fine. If this is true, then verify if with a reliable-source citation. The same holds true with your Moonstone claim. These are core Wikipedia policies that you are violating. You cannot continue to add claims without citation — which I can see from other editors' comments above has been a recurring issue with your edits. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jaguar (Archie Comics) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jaguar (Archie Comics), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaguar (Archie Comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]