User talk:Carlagolden23
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Carlagolden23! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing!
Please read up on these Wikipedia policies:
- WP:Original research - which is what you're doing with your edits to the article
- WP:Conflict of interest - which is what you have because of your personal connection with the subject of the article
- WP:Verifiability - all information in wikipedia must be supported by citations from WP:Reliable sources. Neither you nor your calculations are reliable sources. Any information on Wikipedia which is not supported by a reliable source may be removed on sight
- WP:Consensus - it requires a consensus of editors in discussion on the article's talk page to agree in order to remove information which is reliably sources
- WP:Edit warring - repeatedly editing an article to your preferred version is "edit warring and is a violation of policy. Continuing to edit war can result in being blocked from editing.
Please do not continue as you have up to now. The next time you attempt to make this change without a reliable source to directly support it, you will receive an edit warring warning notice. After that, you will be reported to the Edit Warring Noticeboard for an admin to adjudicate whether you should be blocked ur not. Please don't allow this to happen. Instead, find a reliable source that directly and precisely supports your contention (i.e. one that doesn't require you to infer conclusions from it) and discuss that source on the article talk page. Editors there can examine the reliability of all sources involved and reach consensus about what should, and shouldn't, be in the article.