User talk:Carlosp420

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Carlosp420, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

TheRingess 06:46, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Indian Butterflies Wikiworld :)[edit]

Hi Carlos,

Thanks for your edit to the references on the List of Butterflies of India. I have noted your edit and in future we'll keep this point in mind. We have noted it in our list of administrative changes for a rainy day (presently, we're in data filling mode.)

Welcome to the world of Indian butterflies. Its an exciting place. We're evolving on a daily basis. We're dealing with a 1000 plus butterfly base :) Yummm!. The three of us are AshLin, User:Shyamal and User:VirenVaz. We're tackling the Papilionids first to showcase our concept.

Please do have a look at some of our pages. We'd appreciate constructive criticism :-

Lots of pages are under development offline. Recently, we've recieved a flood of photos by Indian aurelians like Dr Tarique Sani and Rahul Natu. Mr Nadan Kalbag has promised us advice on botanical aspects (my father-in-law :) ). Just give us a few months and away we'll go! We want to provide a good, reliable and useful guide to Indian butterflies for the amateur Indian naturalist. We did'nt have it when we began, we want our next gen to have it.

We request support from wikians, especially wikiaurelians like yourself. I notice you have an interest in Satyrids. Can you support us in taxonomic advice, mentoring etc regarding this part of our project. We're really lacking support in this field. India has a fascinating variety of Satyrids. It would really be valuable to us. We'll acknowledge you or keep it private, exactly as you desire.

Do continue to extend our support and visit us.

Regards, AshLin 14:40, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some raw material on Calinaga from Indian refs sent by email to you. Please confirm receipt. We understand it to be a single species only. Is that no longer the case?AshLin 07:10, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Classification of Satyrinae[edit]

Hey Carlos,

May we request you to place a complete classification of the Satyrinae on that page. I saw your beginning of this task. Alphabetic listing makes little sense. BTW, we're preparing for WikiProject Lepidoptera. AshLin

Wikiproject Peru[edit]

Hi, you might be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Peru, we help expand Peru-related articles and take care of the Portal:Peru. Talk there, thanks. -- Walter Humala Godsave him! (wanna Talk?) 15:02, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Archeuptychia cluena, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.satyrus.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=13&Itemid=26. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 21:15, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your view sought[edit]

As a member of WP Arthropods, you might have a view on this discussion. Thanks in advance. Heds (talk) 03:54, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UNMSM[edit]

Hola Carlos, conteste a tu comentario en la pagina de discusion de National University of San Marcos. No entendi lo que quisiste decir, podrias pasar por ahi para aclarar tu punto? Estoy ayudando con la traduccion del articulo a partir del castellano. Espero que el articulo en ingles llegue a hacerle justicia a mi alma mater como lo hace la version en castellano. Asinthior (talk) 04:16, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Science lovers wanted![edit]

Science lovers wanted!
Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 18:48, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]