Jump to content

User talk:Carman12341

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unblock Request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Carman12341 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is not a sock puppet. I am here for the right reasons, and that is to edit and help build an encyclopedia. I am not here to break any rules of Wikipedia. And I am only wanting to help Carman12341 (talk) 20:58, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

First, edits like your "Normy Barr" page are not helping to build an encyclopedia. Secondly, most sock puppets insist they aren't, when in fact it's blatantly obvious that they are. If you're really wanting to seriously help build the encyclopedia, you need to take the WP:STANDARDOFFER. The Bushranger One ping only 21:26, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Carman12341 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I admit, I have made mistakes in the past such as my Normy Barr article. I am not a sock puppet and I will try my best to stop this obnoxious behavior. I hope an uninvolved administrator will accept my request. Carman12341 (talk) 20:58, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon::==( o ) 00:01, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Carman12341 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Okay, I understand that I have made mistakes but can you please just let me be unblocked. And remember STICK WITH THE BIFF Carman12341 (talk) 20:58, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you sincerely wish to be unblocked, disclose to us all accounts you have created whether you have used them or not. Then tell us which one you're going to use and stick with. And drop that BIFF stuff. If you continue the next admin will have no choice but to revoke your talk page access. — Daniel Case (talk) 01:15, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Carman12341 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have admitted to what I have done and I have apologized and promised not to abuse. The accounts I have made were Nascarman1, Joshkid1, and Carman12341 (this one). I plan to use this account only and will not make any inappropriate or purposeless articles or edits such as the redirect on Jim Rosanblum Racing and the one sentenced article Normy Barr. I am also asking that you unblock my other 2 accounts for I can shut them down. I sincerely apologize from the bottom of my heart. Carman12341 (talk) 18:39, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Carman12341 (talk) 20:58, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You said you understood that one-sentence articles were uncalled for, yet created an even less helpful one-sentence article afterwards. You lied about being a sockpuppet in your first two unblock request here, and in the unblock request at User talk:Joshkid1. I see no reason to believe your assurances this time around. Huon (talk) 19:12, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As it says, Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.. --jpgordon::==( o ) 19:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Carman12341 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What else do you want from me? I have not done anything wrong on this account. I created this account to start fresh, and I would like to be able to edit on Wikipedia. This is my last unblock request, if you decline it well, I'll see you tomorrow with my new account. Carman12341 (talk) 22:25, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't accept unblock requests based on "do this or else I sock" grounds. Declined and talk page access revoked. only (talk) 02:46, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Start a discussion with Carman12341

Start a discussion