User talk:Carmazina

Carmazina, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi Carmazina! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Census data[edit]

Hello, thank you for updating New South Wales census data; I noticed you doing this at Camden, New South Wales. However, please use the template {{Census 2011 AUS}} when doing this (copying the old 2006 census template structure where necessary), and use named references when using a reference more than once. The easiest way to do this would be to copy the structure already used to cite Australian census references in articles. If you have any questions about Wikipedia, feel free to contact me. Graham87 15:37, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, and thanks for your most recent edits to fix the references. A few more things: Wikipedia has an article about the Census in Australia, so it would be good to link that: for Camden I used "According to the 2011 Census ..." but feel free to tweak that. My second point is not that big a deal, but there's also no need for a new line before the </ref> tag. You may be interested in WikiProject Australia and the Australian Wikipedians' notice board. Also, please sign your messages with four tildes like this: "~~~~". I hope all this isn't too overwhelming! Graham87 02:46, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, there's no need to put a paragraph break between each item; they just fit nicely in one paragraph, like I did at the Camden article. By convention references are placed at the end of a paragraph (or sometimes at the end of a sentence where lots of refs are being used, which isn't aplicable here), so splitting each item into paragraphs is just creating unnecessary work for yourself, in my opinion. Graham87 03:06, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done good[edit]

Up to Bl... so:

	The Working Woman's Barnstar
	Crusoe8181 (talk) 10:17, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Republic of Macedonia[edit]

Hi there! You might want to take a look at WP:NCMAC. The name of that country can be a rather contentious matter. Dolescum (talk) 06:07, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome...

Hello, Carmazina, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Sophus Bie ^(talk) 09:15, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Michael Mobbs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Arctic Kangaroo 16:36, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Benjamin Law.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Basket _Feudalist 16:51, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Benjamin Law.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! - tucoxn\^talk 22:38, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Doug Spowart) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Doug Spowart, Carmazina!

Wikipedia editor Jackson Peebles just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great addition, and thank you for your work. Please consider adding an image of Doug Spowart (pursuant to copyright rules) and fixing some formatting (cleaning up refs), but overall fantastic, notable edit! Great work!

To reply, leave a comment on Jackson Peebles's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Benjamin Law concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Benjamin Law, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:50, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Benjamin Law[edit]

Hello Carmazina. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Benjamin Law".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Benjamin Law}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:03, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]