User talk:Carmors

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by IVORK were:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— IVORK Talk 03:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
As previously identified this reads like an essay not an encyclopedic article. Needs to be completely re-written in a neutral point of view and reformatted to meet Wikipedia standards. All factual information should be backed with inline citations - see Wikipedia's guide to referencing for beginners. Do not resubmit until these issues have been addressed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 04:54, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Carmors! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:54, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
PLease read the instructions in respect of how to add citations. Please reduce the large area of text by creating sections / headings. Please review the guide to article creation.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 04:56, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
none of the issues have been addressed?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 18:31, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Carmors/sandbox has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Carmors/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:01, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 20:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Carmors (talk) 20:11, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have been un able to present a Wikipedia Bio for the great and amazing life of my dear Father, he was a true fighter a honorable man, when you Google his name Carlos Morales Treviño, please check the Bio on www.thestoryofarchitect.com blog and www.storyofarchitect.com where you can download the book I wrote both about the life of my father and the most important painting in Ibero-America, of course I understand the need to be encyclopedia related, but remember that both stories come from family albums and documents, so if you want to start a Wikipedia of the Painting, you need to ask yourself the following: Is the Painting real? Yes, was it painted by Miguel Cabrera? Yes, Was Miguel Cabrera an uneducated Indian? Yes, Was this Painting his First? Yes its Certified, Was Miguel Cabrera a Protégée of Bishop Pantaleon Alvarez? Yes, Was Pedro de Cebrian the ViKing of America? Yes, did he take Paintings from Church from Miguel Cabrera to his House? Yes, Was Pedro de Cebrian ambassador from Spain to Vienna at the very important time of the signature of the treaty of Acquisgran? Yes, Was Spain a very important Player? Yes, was a common process of negotiation to invite important people to the Ambassador of Spain house? Yes, was it possible that Mary Therese of Hapsburg saw the Painting at one of those meetings? Yes, was she a Catholic? Yes, Did Mary Therese Loved the Americas and Believed to be her right to rule? Yes, did she contest the Bourbon Crown of the Americas? Yes, would she be moved to see a Painting, the first Miguel Cabrera, an un educated Indian, be moved by the detail and greatness of the Virgin? Yes, Did the Painting end on my House? Yes, My Name is Carlos Morales Urquiza, My email is Carmors@hotmail.com, I thing you are making a disservice to the world by not considering to publish a Wikipedia page of my father Carlos Morales Treviño a and the Painting of Miguel Cabrera XVII The Asencion of the Virgin, hope you reconsider and help publish this amazing story, Best Regards, Carlos Morales Urquiza, and I declare that all the content is 100% true, the Videos and Pictures are Mine and 100% true and I declare as my own copyrights , 100% true and valid of my own.

AfC notification: User:Carmors/sandbox has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Carmors/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:13, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

People say that some paintings speak The painting of the Virgin of Guadalupe was given by God, the painting of the Ascension of the Virgin was painted with the help of God, events of similar importance, the Appearance of the Virgin and her Ascension into heaven surrounded by Angels. Miguel Mateo Maldonado y Cabrera, known as Miguel Cabrera was a painter from New Spain, was born in San Miguel Tlalixtac, Oaxaca, on February 27, 1695 and was a famous exponent of the baroque painting of the viceroyalty. An orphan was protected by the Bishop of Puebla Pantaleón Álvarez y Abreu, who assigned him painter and blacksmith jobs in the works of the Churches, he generally worked a lot and slept little, they say that he was physically skinny and weak, he continually hurt himself, however in 1740 began to draw and when seeing his sketches, the Bishop realized the great potential of this young man. In the year 1745, Don Pedro Cebrian y Agustín, viceroy of the new Spain, saw the work carried out in Puebla Churches and asked the bishop to acquire a painting of the Virgin, taking into account Bishop Pantaleón's devotion to the Virgin, he entrusted the work to Miguel, whom he saw as a special being and full of love for the Virgin of Guadalupe. But Miguel, who was starting to paint, was left-handed, he was just an apprentice, he had injured his hand and it was difficult for him to paint, so by a divine act he used his right hand and in record time he painted the Painting of the Ascension of The Virgin, throughout his life, Miguel always tried to achieve the perfection of his first painting and he never could, it took up to a year or two to deliver his works, but his first painting was made in less a month, they say that God told him how paint. And the Bishop, realizing the majesty of the painting, decided to send it to the Viceroy, who upon seeing it is surprised and amazed at it, "I have never seen a painting that speaks to me" famous phrase that the most illustrious said, so he put it on the main entrance of the Viceroyalty Palace. And in 1742, the Viceroy Don Pedro Cebrian y Agustín, was appointed by His Majesty Felipe V ambassador in Vienna, to represent the kingdom of Spain in the Negotiations of the Austrian Succession, so in that year he traveled to Austria carrying his most precious possession , the Painting of the Ascension of the Virgin. The negotiations on the Succession to the Austrian throne had been long and difficult, Mary Theresa I aspired to the Throne of Austria, Hungary, Bohemia and Croatia, she was the last head of the Habsburg House, and because she was a woman, France, Spain and Great Britain, did not want to recognize her rights, and Prussia also fought her for the territory of Silesia, In the year 1748 during the signing of the Treaty of Aquisgrán, she was finally recognized as sovereign and empress consort of the Holy Roman Empire, Prussia achieved its mission and managed to keep with the territory of Silesia, and Spain obtained the Duchies of Parma, Plasencia and Guastalla for Felipe, son of Felipe V, however remembering that Felipe V was the first Bourbon King and these rights really belonged to the Kingdom of Spanish by Habsburg descent, the house of Austria was not happy. It is in such negotiations that the representative of Frederick the Great, Emperor of Prussia was Prince Karl Anton Augustus of Schleswig-Holstein-Sondenburg-Berg and in the middle of the negotiations on a visit to the house of the ambassador of Spain he saw the painting of the Ascension of the Virgin and realized the importance of it as an exchange token to achieve the signing of the treaty. Mary Theresa was a fervent Catholic, admirer of the New Spain, and she loved the Americas, as a representative of the Habsburgs said the American Kingdoms, corresponded to her; she considered Felipe V as a transgressor of Spain, the Bourbons were French and took over by force the Kingdoms of Spain. Prince Karl asked the Spanish ambassador Don Pedro de Cebrian to sell the painting to be a gift to Mary Theresa and finally achieve the signing of the treaty of Aquisgrán, But Don Pedro de Cebrian did not want to get rid of his beloved possession, so he proposed to one of Felipe V's advisers, Don Andrés de Morales, Regidor of Jaén, to take the painting and hide it, years later Don Pedro de Cebrian still demanded the return of the painting but Don Andrés refused, saying that he had protected the painting, it was until the year 1751, the first year of our era (AD), that Don Andrés officially acquired it for his descendants, a year later Don Pedro died, And Francisco Javier Morales de los Ríos y Pineda (1732-1815), 1st Count of Morales de los Ríos and General of the Royal Navy of His Majesty Carlos IV inherits the painting on the death of his father Don Andrés Morales de los Ríos Ramírez de Arellano , However, it is said that the paintings do not like to be moved, Don Francisco was a great Naval strategist, supreme commander of several battles, he went to live in Havana Cuba in 1783 taking with him the Painting of the Ascension of the Virgin, Years later his grandson Don Francisco Javier de Morales y Luis de León Winthuysen, son of José Ignacio Morales de los Ríos y Morales de los Ríos in Spain, inherited the painting and back in Spain, he had it at home in Soria, Castilla; after his first wife died, his second Laureana Efigenia Ortiz de Zarate's wife was a fervent Catholic, she said that the Painting was Miraculous, since she suffered from many diseases, and by marrying Don Francisco and seeing the Painting, she was cured, her health improved, she also believed that the Painting should never be touched or moved, if so it good bring good luck. His grandson Don José Donaciano Morales de Altamirano, was a remarkable scientist, but he was a man of science, so when he inherited the Painting of the Ascension of the Virgin from his Father Don Carlos Ma. Adrian de Morales y Carreño, and he never cared for it and decided to leave it kept in a winery in his Hacienda de Ixtlahuaca, State of Mexico, After the Mexican Revolution, José Donaciano's family thought that everything had been lost, however Manuel Morales, his grandson, who as a child had known the hacienda, years later decided to go and look for some hidden treasure, to his surprise, everything had been destroyed, there was only a painting in poor condition with bullet holes left in the basement of the Hacienda, so he decided to take it and pay some coins to the guards, Manuel had a lot of hatred in his mind, he did not believe in God and he decided to keep the painting in the hovel of his House, years after the death of Manuel, his nephew, Carlos Morales Treviño, was visiting his Uncle's house, when the maid Rosa´s husband, told him that Manuel had left him a painting and that he had called someone to evaluate it and had given him an offer for 5,000 pesos to buy it; so the Arquitect Carlos Morales Treviño went to see the Painting and loved it , offered to pay him double amount of 10,000, and acquired the painting and send it to Bellas Artes to fix and restoration. The Painting of the Ascension of the Virgin would accompany him and be a symbol for the rest of his entire life, a symbol of virtue, a symbol of love of God and divine illumination on all the things that he did.


Teahouse logo
Hello! Carmors, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Theroadislong (talk) 20:15, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Theroadislong (talk) 20:48, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are not reading the post, please review the 12 FACTS, Historic Facts and please help, re sending post: I have been un able to present a Wikipedia Bio for the great and amazing life of my dear Father, he was a true fighter a honorable man, when you Google his name Carlos Morales Treviño, please check the Bio on www.thestoryofarchitect.com blog and www.storyofarchitect.com where you can download the book I wrote both about the life of my father and the most important painting in Ibero-America, of course I understand the need to be encyclopedia related, but remember that both stories come from family albums and documents, so if you want to start a Wikipedia of the Painting, you need to ask yourself the following: Is the Painting real? Yes, was it painted by Miguel Cabrera? Yes, Was Miguel Cabrera an uneducated Indian? Yes, Was this Painting his First? Yes its Certified, Was Miguel Cabrera a Protégée of Bishop Pantaleon Alvarez? Yes, Was Pedro de Cebrian the ViKing of America? Yes, did he take Paintings from Church from Miguel Cabrera to his House? Yes, Was Pedro de Cebrian ambassador from Spain to Vienna at the very important time of the signature of the treaty of Acquisgran? Yes, Was Spain a very important Player? Yes, was a common process of negotiation to invite important people to the Ambassador of Spain house? Yes, was it possible that Mary Therese of Hapsburg saw the Painting at one of those meetings? Yes, was she a Catholic? Yes, Did Mary Therese Loved the Americas and Believed to be her right to rule? Yes, did she contest the Bourbon Crown of the Americas? Yes, would she be moved to see a Painting, the first Miguel Cabrera, an un educated Indian, be moved by the detail and greatness of the Virgin? Yes, Did the Painting end on my House? Yes, My Name is Carlos Morales Urquiza, My email is Carmors@hotmail.com, I thing you are making a disservice to the world by not considering to publish a Wikipedia page of my father Carlos Morales Treviño a and the Painting of Miguel Cabrera XVII The Asencion of the Virgin, hope you reconsider and help publish this amazing story, Best Regards, Carlos Morales Urquiza, and I declare that all the content is 100% true, the Videos and Pictures are Mine and 100% true and I declare as my own copyrights , 100% true and valid of my own, is it a beautiful Painting and Story? YES.

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, Carmors. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Possibly (talk) 22:58, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OMG if you are really ocusing me of Vandalism, please tell me anything I need to Provide so you are confident, My NAME IS CARLOS MORALES URQUIZA, MY EMAIL IS carmors@hotmail.com, My Mobile ios +525516510221, AGAIN I OWN ALL COPYWRITE RELATED TO BOOK, AGAIN I SUBMITED 12 HISTORIC FACTS, AGAIN I AM AT YOUR SERVICE TO SHOW ANYTHING YOU NEED RELATED TO THIS MATTER!!!!!, AGAIN I SUBMIT, PLEASE READ IT

I have been un able to present a Wikipedia Bio for the great and amazing life of my dear Father, he was a true fighter a honorable man, when you Google his name Carlos Morales Treviño, please check the Bio on www.thestoryofarchitect.com blog and www.storyofarchitect.com where you can download the book I wrote both about the life of my father and the most important painting in Ibero-America, of course I understand the need to be encyclopedia related, but remember that both stories come from family albums and documents, so if you want to start a Wikipedia of the Painting, you need to ask yourself the following: Is the Painting real? Yes, was it painted by Miguel Cabrera? Yes, Was Miguel Cabrera an uneducated Indian? Yes, Was this Painting his First? Yes its Certified, Was Miguel Cabrera a Protégée of Bishop Pantaleon Alvarez? Yes, Was Pedro de Cebrian the ViKing of America? Yes, did he take Paintings from Church from Miguel Cabrera to his House? Yes, Was Pedro de Cebrian ambassador from Spain to Vienna at the very important time of the signature of the treaty of Acquisgran? Yes, Was Spain a very important Player? Yes, was a common process of negotiation to invite important people to the Ambassador of Spain house? Yes, was it possible that Mary Therese of Hapsburg saw the Painting at one of those meetings? Yes, was she a Catholic? Yes, Did Mary Therese Loved the Americas and Believed to be her right to rule? Yes, did she contest the Bourbon Crown of the Americas? Yes, would she be moved to see a Painting, the first Miguel Cabrera, an un educated Indian, be moved by the detail and greatness of the Virgin? Yes, Did the Painting end on my House? Yes, My Name is Carlos Morales Urquiza, My email is Carmors@hotmail.com, I thing you are making a disservice to the world by not considering to publish a Wikipedia page of my father Carlos Morales Treviño a and the Painting of Miguel Cabrera XVII The Asencion of the Virgin, hope you reconsider and help publish this amazing story, Best Regards, Carlos Morales Urquiza, and I declare that all the content is 100% true, the Videos and Pictures are Mine and 100% true and I declare as my own copyrights , 100% true and valid of my own, is it a beautiful Painting and Story? YES.

December 2020[edit]

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User talk:IVORK may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Please host a local discussion rather than spam posting the same content anywhere on reviewers' pages. Also look to all the reasons listed in your draft as to why your draft's subject is not notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia — IVORK Talk 03:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:IVORK. Again, please stop posting messages in bulk and out of sections to reviewers' talk pages. This is not a way to convince editors to push your denied article through AfC. — IVORK Talk 05:08, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Carmors/sandbox[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Carmors/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JavaHurricane 09:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About your father[edit]

I skimmed the book you wrote. I had to hunt for it but I eventually found it. I was hoping to find a bibliography listing third-party sources that might be usable, but there was no bibliography.

Unfortunately, without references to third-party sources that are considered reliable, such as major newspapers, magazines, and the like, which provide significant, non-routine coverage, no draft article about your father, no matter how well-written, can be accepted.

It is very hard to write an acceptable biographical article about someone who isn't either outright famous unless they have a lot of non-routine media coverage. For example, top-rated athletes tend to get media coverage beyond the "routine" stories about their sports.

With few exceptions such as astronauts, relatively few people in any career field will ever be "notable" enough for Wikipedia.

Please read WP:Your first article for more information on Wikipedia's requirements.

If you are unblocked, accept that, unless there are reliable, independent sources (sources written by you or him are NOT "independent") providing significant, non-routine coverage of your father's life or career, you should not attempt to write a Wikipedia article about him or his works. If you DO find such sources, please read WP:Conflict of interest before proceeding. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 15:38, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Carmors&oldid=1015994123"